is this really what CHRIST wanted?

Discussion about the various True Orthodox Churches around the world including current events. Subforums in other langauges, primarily English on the main forum.


Moderator: Mark Templet

romiosini

is this really what CHRIST wanted?

Post by romiosini »

Is this what CHRIST really wanted from our CHURCH. (Speaking of the HOLY CATHOLIC and APOSTOLIC CHURCH, ORTHODOXY) Is it really what thought of a CHURCH is so many seperations? So many jurisdictions? So much wars? (I.E. Gregory issue, Matthewite not regarding the Kiousite, many more in World Orthodoxy) Has anyone thought, is this the Christian teaching of Christ? (Has anyone seen how many bishops today either are Ecumenists or are extremists to the bone who even go crazy to accept other Orthodox Christians again through Baptism! :shock: ) Grace here, Grace there. No wonder not many of the younger generation doesn't care about faith, they would think (Greeks in general) that Orthodoxy is just like Catholicism. (They condemn, they argue, the do things alike such as praying together, or simply ban those who use the gregorian calendar.) Has anyone thought, that maybe someone following the new calendar can find salvation too? Has anyone thought, that maybe, someone under Ecumenist Jurisdictions can be saved too? Han anyone thought, that maybe holy men and women can appear to World Orthodoxy and do miracles? It's starting to get to me, how the pride of man, has taken over our Church, which belongs to the faithful. Sorry for my long blabbering, but this is a severe situation of great consideration that needs to be taken.

Romiosyne

Miriam
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat 2 August 2003 5:59 pm

Post by Miriam »

Romiosini:

This is something I have pondered a great deal lately. A friend of mine recently said that she had read somewhere that toward the end times we will be reduced to individual home churches or small parishes with single priests. How sad that we have let power, ambition, money and greed turn God's truth into something else.

I think when we all stand at the final Judgement we will discover that Christ wanted something completely different from us. While He does try to nudge us from time to time, I think we have lost the ability to truly hear Him.

I fear for us.....

The Jews have a teaching that says that as long as there are 36 truly righteous people in the world, the world will not end.... Personally I think we have the same problem as Lot did....there aren't that many truly righteous people in the world and we would be hard pressed to find them.

<sigh>
Miriam :(

romiosini

Post by romiosini »

I think that Extreme Traditionalists or Extreme Modernist (W.O.) are simply cowards for caring for the sake of the Unity of Orthodoxy that it once had 200 years ago. How can anyone think anymore that there is only 1 Archdiocese or Diocese or Metropolis that is the True Church? That is severe ignorant arragance of many traditionalists today. Or how can modernists and extremists have the good Orthodox conscience to be playing against the canons without feeling wrong about it. It's seems that canons have been broken all around, and no one is able to obey, not even an ultra-extreme synod that is traditionalist. It's funny all these hierarchs today, haven't questionned themselves, is this what Christ really wanted?

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

How can anyone think anymore that there is only 1 Archdiocese or Diocese or Metropolis that is the True Church? That is severe ignorant arragance of many traditionalists today.

Romiosini,

I feel completely comfortably saying that the new-calendarists are all part of a heretical communion and outside the Church. This because I have demonstrated it with long posts pointing out the teachings of the fathers, which are available for anyone to dispute.

It is true enough the Church is not only afflicted with the Ecumenist heretics, but also schismatics. But I feel it to be quite an injustice when someone feels it is their prerogative to make grandiose claims without a shred of thought to back it up. And without this backup, your statements can be taken as nothing more than stereotypes and name-calling. It is like the question: "Have you stopped beating your wife?" No matter that you in fact never beat your wife, just saying this in public stains your reputation and everyones image of you.

Now, I have always challenged any ecumenist friends and people who perhaps just ahve a herd mentality, and to this day, after several years of askign people like you, I have never gotten a response. So I will also ask you, an ecumenist.

Please show me were it is that in any place or time, any Holy Synod or Holy Father, said it was acceptable to commune with a heretic. Because in the great many instances, which I am prepared to cite once again, the Fathers instruct us to run, not only from them, but from their communion.

That is my challenge to you. Not only will you fail (miserably) to find even once where your corrupt ecclesiology is born in Tradition, you will find a vast pile of evidence saying the extreme opposite. But what will you do? Will you listen to the Holy Fathers or continue following the "herd"?

romiosini

Post by romiosini »

Challenges. :ohvey: That's the Christian teaching, to challenge everyone with certain proof. So you believe Christ seperated his believers with the Gentiles and the Jews? I don't need to pretend or act like a Theologian to have Faith, or I need to get slandering proof by using the Fathers' writings. Have you noticed here, the majority do not belong to your traditionalist diocese? Except of realizing how much we could do, when our hierarchs could've stopped all these problems, they just keep on fighting and accusing one another. The best example is when the "Genuine" Orthodox Church was founded and Chrysostom was made first hierarch. All of a sudden some of them has some personal issues with eachother and Matthew breaks away and becomes also Archbishop of Athens and of all Greece. Making parallel archdioceses, and more parallel problems. And from those two, they kept on breaking, and we have today in Greece, 6 synods who claim to believe in the same thing, preaching the truth, but do not aknowledge eachother because of their supreme pride of man that they have. You claimed that I was an ecumenist. But what really takes for a person to be called Ecumenist? Have I gone praying with a Heretic, have I paid attention to non-Orthodox? But of course! Traditionalists have Grace and non else does, and they have the Grace to judge. You would be surprised on how Traditionalists are, even at confession they can call you an adulterer or whore. (Many people from this forum can relate to that). Anyways, for what there is, (it doesn't to be an opinion only, it's becoming a fact) everyone, has broken canons, does that make them heretics? Grace this Grace that. Have you actually that New Calendar Church of Greece, has brought out so many Saints? Such as Saint Nicholas Planas, or Saint Philotheus Zervakos? Especially Saint Philotheus, who was a spiritual son of Saint Nectarius, who explained the major differences of the Calendar very clearly, and has taught, that if someone has no faith, what is the need of a Calendar? Are all old Calendarists (From everywhere, MP, ROCOR, Genuine Orthodox churches and JP, SP, GP.. and all the others) holy for using the old calendar? Suddenly if you can find me a second John Maximovitch, in any extreme Traditionalist please don't cease to proove it. I'm sorry to say, Saint John never stated himself on how the Russian Orthodox that did belong to the MP are outside of the Church.

I was reading lately about Peter the Iberian who was a monophysite. Did that mean that what the people of his diocese we're placed out of the church? Of course not, they returned to the church once Bishop Peter died. It's funny so many bishops have opinions, and very little of them say it's dogma. Many judge Saint Augustine is a heretic. but is he really?

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

Challenges. That's the Christian teaching, to challenge everyone with certain proof. So you believe Christ seperated his believers with the Gentiles and the Jews? I don't need to pretend or act like a Theologian to have Faith, or I need to get slandering proof by using the Fathers' writings.(big snip)

Thank you for once again proving the long standing point, which would have to be answered before we could discuss any of the many other ad hominums you are confusing the issue with.

You see, the Orthodox faith is not built on feelings or ad hominum attacks, but only the sure foundations which Jesus laid through the Holy Fathers. What they say is of great importance and it is because of this we must first find out the true path, before we can think to critize that path. How can someone say they do not follow the Holy Fathers and Holy Tradition, but yet say they are the Church? And then say another is not the Church because their struggle appears great? Who is grounded in Holy Tradition and who is the communion of heretics? Well, fortunatley, you just answered this question.

"Whosoever cometh to me, and heareth my sayings, and doeth them, I will shew you to whom he is like:

He is like a man which built an house, and digged deep, and laid the foundation on a rock: and when the flood arose, the stream beat vehemently upon that house, and could not shake it: for it was founded upon a rock.

But he that heareth, and doeth not, is like a man that without a foundation built an house upon the earth; against which the stream did beat vehemently, and immediately it fell; and the ruin of that house was great." -- LUKE 6:47-49 (KJV)

Christ here is not talking about an earthly house or an organization. He is talking about the spiritual house, the Church. The ruin of those in heresy is great, although it may even have the appearance of a great earthly success. But for those who have sure foundations are those who follow the truth. Don't think the demons don't recognize them and cause them the greatest trials on earth.

Miriam
Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat 2 August 2003 5:59 pm

Post by Miriam »

OOD:

I can't argue with you on your challenge, simply because I do not have the necessary background to even begin, however you make a statement at the end of you commentary with which I have a bit of a problem. You said " Will you listen to the Holy Fathers or continue following the "herd"?" My problem is with that "herd" mentality. For the last few years I have been noticng this aspect of Orthodox life and it is disturbing to me. We are taught from day one to be sheep, not just in our secular lives, but also in our religious lives. The concept of under obedience is ingrained into Orthodox teachings. We study, (although not always encouraged by our church leaders...I had a learned Orthodox theologian say to the youth of our church when they asked for more indepth teaching that what they heard in church as sufficient). We question and in return get pat answers. We are most certainly discouraged from demanding good answers. There are many a priest who take that"because I said so " routine.

Then as a simple believer you find yourself in the middle of a turmoil, or a split and you have to decide are you a sheep and following the herd (which herd do you follow...it's all sooo confusing!!)or are you a thinker, questioner , someone who needs more info? But where do you get it and how do you decide? Whom to believe? Whom do you not believe? What if you pick wrong? How do you justify your answer?

My husband says that the Herd mentality in Orthodoxy is a left over from the old Soviet regimes, I don't know...personally I think it's been around a lot longer.

Our bishops do have a certain responcibility to their "sheep", they are supposed to take care of us, guide us, and so forth. But what is a person supposed to do when those learned men start squabbling amongst themselves? or even causing splits?

I'm sorry but for the simple people all this is too too confusing and many of us are left high and dry, not knowing what to do. Often choosing because of past associations with a particular priest or bishop. Never fully knowing if they made the "right" choise.

miriam

Post Reply