+
Code: Select all
DEAR BROTHERS IN CHRIST AND REV.DEACON FR. NICHOLAS, PLEASE EXCUSE ME FOR MY BAD ENGLISH.
Dear Deacon Fr. Nicholas,
21 Et edentibus illis, dixit: " Amen dico vobis: Unus vestrum me traditurus est ".22 Et contristati valde, coeperunt singuli dicere ei: " Numquid ego sum, Domine? ".23 At ipse respondens ait: " Qui intingit mecum manum in paropside, hic me tradet.24 Filius quidem hominis vadit, sicut scriptum est de illo.25 Respondens autem Iudas, qui tradidit eum, dixit: " Numquid ego sum, Rabbi? ". Ait illi: " TU DIXISTI ".
(Evangelium secundum Matthaeum, Cap 25.)
Rejoice in the Lord!
In spite of your unaddressed message, I can only consider that it is directed to me, and besides I can only regret your unmoderate lenguage. Excuse me for say this, but your ecclesiastical ordination must claim you to have a more sober style.
Besides this, I has not been informed of your answer at my E-Mail, as ever before. Why?
Code: Select all
Perhaps you can read the minds of orhers,( perhaps not, and I sincerelly am more oriented to think that not), and then you can express what you perceived as my thinking.
Sincerelly I am not capable of read the think of others, and again I think that you not, and that what you think about the thinking of others is only your imagination, that someones can name maliciously prelest.
Code: Select all
I expect that the reading of this evangelical “perikopé” clarify (spiritually) your doubts.
My only aim in write my messages has been the defense of the Forum. Clearly I am not the owner of it, and I am grateful to all the members the interest of reading in unknown crowds this interchange of messages.
If you think, sadly, that I must leave the Forum for my defense of it, or someone had planned my eviction, banning me, I only can say to you,that you are nor insane nor fool, you are, and excuse me for say this, only uninformed, unwise and unaware.
As I have said previously, is seemming that the only “politically correct” language in the Forum is that whose aim is bashing the ROCOR, the Synod Of Resistants, or other more sober Churches.
If a member emit the minimous doubt against what he perceives as schismatic moves, he is submited at one Inquisitorial scrutinious, but if that same member writes doesn’t matter what, against a sober bishop this is welcome.
I can only say that for me and other many members of the Café this is outrageous.
At least must be a form of equivalence, ouside of “reading of minds”, the “judge of aims”, and other forms of what is abusive to name spiritual discernment , what in the Orthodox parádosis is other thing. This thing is solely the Love of Christ and others, the submission of our will at the Will of God, and the respect for the Truth that is not less than the Name of the Incarnate Logos.
You, my Reverend Deacon Nicholas, has been beg for communicate with me in my messages.
You elected not. It’s your responsibility.
As you must know there are not a little difference between the nude facts and that we desire of it. And there are more difference if we are deceived.
As you can see,and as I say previously I do no wish name or indicate the deceiver clearly.
This is a opportunity to him and his conscience to shut up and not play more the teacher.
Code: Select all
If you, despite the work that I envisaged, think of other form it’s your right.
But clearly, one do not throw stones if lives in a glass home.
IN THE LOVE OF CHRIST,
GIORGOS
PS. I beg you your pardon ,and again is my friendly wish that if you have any doubt communicate with me.