Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churches

This is a safe harbor for inquirers and catechumen to ask questions and share their journey into Holy Orthodoxy. Please be kind to our newcomers and warmly welcome them. All Forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.
User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churc

Post by Maria »

Our True Orthodox bishops are canonical. They follow the holy canons. However, the World Orthodox bishops do not follow the canons against praying with heretics. Can the WO Bishops be called canonical?

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

Agios_Irineos
Member
Posts: 406
Joined: Fri 20 September 2013 3:22 pm

Re: Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churc

Post by Agios_Irineos »

If you don't follow the canons, by definition you cannot be canonical!

Unfortunately, the world orthodox jurisdictions have co-opted and corrupted the word canonical and redefined it to represent some sort of seal of approval that they have declared themselves the sole arbiters of who receives this "mark". However, even a cursory reading of church history reveals numerous instances where the "official" or "approved" bishops fell away from the faith and were opposed by pious monks, bishops and faithful who held to the true faith and the canons of the Church. Under today's definition of canonical as offered by the world orthodox, Arians seated on the throne of Constantinople would have been "canonical" except of course, they weren't -- they were heretics. Canonical can only mean following the canons. Any other definition is illegitimate.

User avatar
Barbara
Protoposter
Posts: 4061
Joined: Sat 29 September 2012 6:03 pm

Re: Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churc

Post by Barbara »

Seekermark, thank you for explaining precisely the twisting of the word "canonical" by World Orthodox
jurisdictions to suit their agendas. I hope all new inquirers will be reading this, so they won't be taken in or
feel pulled to be in a "canonical" jurisdiction. In fact, this could be better described as a "con" operation than a
canonical one !

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churc

Post by Maria »

Barbara wrote:

Seekermark, thank you for explaining precisely the twisting of the word "canonical" by World Orthodox
jurisdictions to suit their agendas. I hope all new inquirers will be reading this, so they won't be taken in or
feel pulled to be in a "canonical" jurisdiction. In fact, this could be better described as a "con" operation than a
canonical one !

Yes, the WO are quick to call themselves "Canonical" while labeling the True Orthdoox who follow the Holy Canons as "uncanonical."

However, remember that the so-called "canonical" churches are not really "canonical" as they do not obey the Holy Canons, especially the ones saying not to pray with heretics. I saw several GOARCH Vesperal Service with Anglicans, Lutherans, and Methodists who refused to call Jesus the SON of God, or refer to Him as LORD and MASTER. Before I converted from Roman Catholicism to Orthodoxy, I remember Catholic men and women in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles who would read the Epistle in church and who would refer to an Apostle (one of the Chosen Twelve) as a "she."

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

User avatar
Justin Kolodziej
Newbie
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri 19 September 2014 8:02 pm
Faith: Want to confess the True Faith without compromise
Jurisdiction: Need to be received by the Church
Location: Cary, North Carolina

Re: Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churc

Post by Justin Kolodziej »

that's terrible!

Anyway, it seems to me that the actions of the world Orthodox hierarchs dishonor, if not outright mock, the Fathers of the various Councils that proclaimed the One Faith.

...which is why I'm here.

That would explain why, when I visited the OCA parish a while back, at that time ready to exit Rome if there was a sign the OCA was in the true church, the liturgy seemed dead with no Spirit...because it was!

Though it doesn't explain why it even seemed worse than the Uniate liturgies I had been going to occasionally and at times even the Roman ones. Probably just a superficial impression, or some deception.

(edit to add): That happened to be the Sunday of Orthodoxy there...but no anathemas were read at all at the Divine Liturgy.

Wherever even the last two or three are gathered together in His name, there He is in their midst.

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Inquirer asking another question about "canonical" churc

Post by Maria »

The anathemas are read during Vespers.

If you have not yet been to a Vespers service, you are missing one of our most beautiful Holy Services that recalls the Second Coming of Christ and prepares us to receive Holy Communion at the morning Divine Liturgy.

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

KOSTACC
Jr Member
Posts: 67
Joined: Mon 28 July 2014 11:32 pm
Faith: ORTHODOX
Jurisdiction: GOC-K

another question about "canonical" churches

Post by KOSTACC »

The World Orthodox have Apostolic succession but can't really be called canonical because they don't follow the canons and, or, have changed the spirit of the canons. Likewise, a jurisdiction that calls itself True Orthodox, follows the Church Calendar, and does every other thing correctly, yet is in schism or heresy [...] is not canonical either. Regardless if they follow the canons or have some form of Apostolic succession, they are not truly canonical either. [....]

Please be careful to avoid any mention of polemics.
Polemics can be discussed in World Orthodoxy, Miscellaneous, Politics, and in the Intra-TOC Polemics forums.

Maria,
Administrator

Last edited by Maria on Mon 29 September 2014 3:38 pm, edited 5 times in total.
Reason: edited to remove polemics
Post Reply