If the answer is yes it is in line with the general mentality that existed in the Orthodox Church from the turn of the century. St. Tikhon (later martyred by the Communists) and St. Nicholai Velimirovich both had joint prayer services with Anglicans earlier in the century (in America and London). A Mason who installed a very large Masonic coat of arms (instead of a Cross) above the Greek School that he built in the Phanar in 1877 (Joachim III) was Patriarch of Constantinople from 1901-1912.
The Romanovs (Alexander III) bowed to pressure from the head of the Anglican Church (Victoria) and had participated in an Anglican marriage service after the Orthodox marriage service (for their son and the Lutheran Elizabeth (later Saint) in St. Petersburg in the 1880's.
Every Orthodox Church knew that Joachim III was a Mason and that included Met. Antony Krapovitsky who was his close personal friend. So for the Orthodox Churches as as whole, it was allowed (with a gentleman's wink) to be a Mason and a Patriarch at the same time at the turn of the century.
Joachim III was the first to posit the heresy of ecumenism in an Encyclical in 1903 and he was also in favor of the calendar change to the Menaion as the very least.
It was considered Victorian bad manners to consider Victoria an heretic and under the anathema of 1285, much less the Pan Orthodox Councils. After all she was a monarch in the eyes of the Orthodox world. Monarchy, Victorian good manners and ecumenical tolerance was the order of the day and trumped Orthodox anathemas. By 1925 Met Antony Krapovitsky was winking at Meletius Metaxis (another very public Masonic Patriarch who just became Patriarch of Alexandria) as he walked in procession at Nicea with another pack of heretics.
Being Russian, he escaped being confronted by everyone except St. Theophan of Poltava and that was only a private rebuke.
This general attitude prevailed and has not been repented of to this day. Most of this happened before 1924. I think a perverted sense of monastic and autocratic obedience permeated the Orthodox Church as a whole so that all the saints and confessors who later confronted this heretical attitude were very passive before 1920.
This is the original sin of the Old Calendrists in my opinion: this attitude that extended from the Greek War of Independence to 1924 (about 100 years) and was present in the other local churches too. Masonic ecumenical tolerance invaded all the churches and monarchies. The punishment: God allowed all of this to be swept away.
A minister of Masonic Baal on the throne of Constantinople was unacceptable to God.
But it was very acceptable to the entire Orthodox Church before 1920. How can any Old Calendrist cast the first stone at anyone now given this attitude which was shared by all then. As Anna Akmatova poetically once wrote in 1914 before WW1: the beginning of the punishment allowed by God: "We Are All Drunkards Here."
If Met. Antony stands condemned for his joint prayers at Nicea with heretics in 1925, then all before him stand condemned for the same thing or cowardly silence in letting it happen. We also stand condemned today for a cowardly nod and a wink at the atmosphere before 1920 (and at the same time the Pharisitical belief that only we (a certain local church) is without sin. We think we are without sin and thus think we can throw all the stones we want to throw at the other OC TOC's churches.
And so the punishment continues: division of a house based on the bad foundation of 1821-1920.