Rather it has always been the case that ROCOR has been biding its time over the last ten years since the fall of Communism and the Soviet Union, waiting for the Moscow Patriarchate to dissolve and become once more the Russian Orthodox Church. It has been a long wait and we are still waiting.
This is stated perfectly! Or maybe I just think it does because it sums up my own view I know one thing, I would have loved to have been a fly on the wall a little while ago when Patriarch Ignatius of Antioch visited the MP.
what is the problem with ROCOR and the OCA? Please forgive my ignorance.
Neither group officially recognizes the other. The OCA deems itself valid because it was granted autocephalous status by the Moscow Patriarchate (MP), and ROCOR deems itself valid because it was canonically formed and has continually fought against the MP. In other words, the Patriarchate that one group (OCA) views as a bestower of independence, the other group (ROCOR) views as un-Orthodox, and at times even heretical (E.g., affirming Sergianism). What we have here is more than a failure to communicate.
I agree with what Chrysostomos said though, relations between the two Churches in America, at the grass roots level, are not so tense as the online polemical literature might lead one to believe.
I believe Bishop Ware is from England and lately what he has been spouting concerns me.
Did you have anything in particular in mind? His changing position on birth control is a bit disheartening to me (especially since his books are normally seen as the authoritative introduction to Orthodoxy), but I hadn't noticed many other ... um... "concerns"