May 2006: THE ROCOR & THE MP UNITE!

Information, news stories, and questions about True Traditionalist Orthodox Churches. This is the place to post encyclicals and any official public communications from True Orthodox jurisdictions.


Moderator: Mark Templet

Nathaniel Kapner

Konstantin Preobrazhensky - EX KGB!

Post by Nathaniel Kapner »

ROCOR Konstantin Preobrazhensky is a famous intelligence expert and specialist on Japan, author of six books about Japan.

He was born in 1953 in Moscow, Russia. In 1976, he graduated from the Institute of Asia and Africa of the Moscow University with an M.A. In 1975-76 K. Preobrazhensky was an intern at Tokai University, Tokyo, Japan.

From 1976-91 he served as an officer in KGB Intelligence. His last position was as personal advisor on China, Japan and Korea, to the
Head of the Scientific and Technical Intelligence of the KGB.

From 1980-85 K. Preobrazhensky was the senior officer at the KGB station in Tokyo, Japan. He was ostensibly the correspondent of TASS, Telegraph Agency of the Soviet Union. But for him it was not just a cover, as he is a born writer. He wrote many literary pieces about Japan, some of which were later considered masterpieces.

As a KGB officer he concentrated on the recruitment of Chinese scholars for Soviet Scientific and Technical Intelligence. He reported directly to Victor Chebrikov, KGB Chairman, and Vladimir Kryuchkov, Head of KGB Intelligence. K. Preobrazhensky was promoted to Lieutenant Colonel as a young officer.

In July 1985, K. Preobrazhensky became the center of a sensational spy scandal. The Japanese police caught him at a meeting with his Chinese agent, whom he had previously recruited. He was released in a couple of hours, but the KGB forcibly returned him to Moscow. Though the reason of this failure was unknown, the KGB accused K. Preobrazhensky of it solely. He suffered much undeserved humiliation which he later described in his book "The Spy Who Loved Japan" (Tokyo, 1994).

In 1991 K. Preobrazhensky left the KGB and became its harshest critic. His books and articles unmask its inhumane and illegal activities.

From 1993-2002 he was a security issues columnist for the "Moscow Times", a Moscow based English language newspaper. His articles, disclosing the activities of the KGB made him world famous.

His activities have irritated the KGB greatly. K. Preobrazhensky suffered many provocations including attempted illegal arrest, but managed to escape thanks to his lawyers. But after President Putin’s coming to power, it has become impossible. KGB dissidents and critics are jailed and murdered in Russia now. That is why in January 2003 K. Preobrazhensky fled to the U.S.A.

Here in the U.S.A. he continues to unmask the KGB. He is a regular speaker on the Voice of America, has given lectures at: Columbia, Georgetown and Johns Hopkins Universities, where he also has given a
seminar "Asian Security".

K. Preobrazhensky has been quoted and published by: The Associated Press, Association of Former Intelligence Officers Weekly; Intelligence Notes, BBC, Boston Globe, Christian Science Monitor, East- Asia-Intel.com, Financial Times, Japanese media, Los Angeles Times, Spy Tech Agency Intel Bulletin, Russia Reform Monitor, American Foreign Policy Council, Newsweek, London Observer,NewsMax.com, The New American, Reuters, The Russia Journal, SKY News, The Weekly Standard, and The Washington Post.

In Russian, K.Preobrazhensky’s family name means "Transfiguration". It says that he is a descendant of the family of Russian clergy. Actually, his ancestors were Rectors of the Transfiguration Church in the Tver diocese, after which they got they family name.

Aatthe end of the 19th century, the Preobrazhenskys, like a lot of other Russian clergy, became the laymen intelligentsia, teachers and doctors. Mr. Preobrazhensky’s grandfather, Alexander, was a prominent Soviet medical doctor, endocrinologist, consultant at the Kremlin Hospital and a secret Orthodox Christian. He was one of those few doctors, who were allowed to examine and treat Stalin personally.

Like most of them he was subjected to arrest in 1953, but escaped it thanks to Stalin’s death.

K. Preobrazhensky father, George, was a KGB Major General, the Deputy Commander of the Frontier Troops of the KGB. He was a secret Orthodox Christian too. The religious faith was considered an ideological crime for KGB generals, who all were supposed to be fanatic Communists.

The disclosure of faith of the KGB officer would cause immediate expulsion from the KGB and Communist Party, making him an outcast in the Soviet society and dooming his family to poverty. But still Mr.
Preobrazhesky’s father has nourished his son in the Orthodox faith.

While in the KGB, K.Preobrazhensky did his bestin learning how the KGB was working on the Church. He has interviewed many KGB officers with regard to their activities in recruiting priests or acting under the cover of clergymen by themselves. This priceless information was later used in his books and articles.

K. Preobrazhensky has discovered that KGB considered itself to be a sort of Church too, as it was controlling human souls. It checked people’s Communist faith if it was sincere or hypocritical. That’s why the KGB officers called themselves "The doctors of human souls,"as if they were priests.

It gave the title of a chapter of K.Preobrazhensky’s book "KGB in Japan"(Moscow, 2000), which was the first in the world literature to describe this phenomenon. It has described the KGB work on the Church viewed not by a believer or priest, but by a KGB officer,from inside.

Also, while in the KGB, K.Preobrazhensky had learned very well that the KGB was going to absorb the Russian Church Abroad in order to put Russian emigration all over the world under their surveiance and control.

In 1980 he had gained access and read a top-secret plan of the KGB activities, aiming at the disintegration of Russian Church Abroad.

Since coming to the U.S.A. in 2003, K. Preobrazhensky is courageously fighting for the Church so as not to allow this plan of the KGB to be finally accomplished.

All American patriots should join their efforts so as to not allow the massive penetration of KGB under the cover of Moscow Patriarchy, into the U.S.A.

Konstantin Preobrazhensky resides in the Washington D.C. area and attends "St John The Baptist,"the ROCOR Cathedral Church in Washington D.C.

For my dear friend and fellow-laborer in Christ's Vineyard,

ROAC Subdeacon Nathaniel Kapner
The Eleventh Hour

Nathaniel Kapner

Subject: ROCOR Properties & The MP

Post by Nathaniel Kapner »

Subject: ROCOR Properties & The MP

Recently this year ROCOR Abp Mark Arndt of Berlin granted an
interview in which ROCOR properties were discussed. [See Excerpt
Below.]

My question to all of you in ROCOR is "What steps have been
taken since May of 2005 that have ensured "trust" that the Russian
government and the MP will not take over ROCOR properties?"

Interview With ROCOR Abp Mark Arndt:

"For many it is difficult to imagine concretely the status of the
Church Abroad as a self-governing part of one Russian Church. A few
clarifications are necessary in this regard.

"There are also fears with regard to property. Russian President
Vladimir Putin
during our meeting in May of this year, [2005] in
the presence of Patriarch Alexy II and the First Hierarch of the
ROCOR, Metropolitan Laurus, unequivocally spoke on this matter,
stressing that neither the Russian government nor the ROC will make
any claims on the property of the Church Abroad.

"Still, many people have little trust! Steps must me taken to ensure
such trust."

Thank you

ROAC Subdeacon Nathaniel Kapner

Nathaniel Kapner

ROCOR Fr A Lebedeff & hs "Iron Curtain Perspective&

Post by Nathaniel Kapner »

Subject: ROCOR Fr. Alexander Lebedeff and his 'Iron Curtain'

On October 29, 2005, ROCOR Protopresbyter Father Alexander
Lebedeff, challanged the Anti MP/ROCOR Unionists, on by his post to
Orthodox-Tradition Discussion Group known as "Paradosis" at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/orthodox-tradition, with the following:

"In the midst of accusations that some people are "rewriting the
history of the Church Abroad"--the following text from the
official publication of the Synod of Bishops of the Russian Orthodox
Church Outside of Russia -- "Church Life," edited by (at that time)
Protopresbyter George Grabbe (issue of April-June, 1966), should
be read and noted carefully:

"THE RUSSIAN CHURCH ABROAD

"What shall we say about the canonical status of the Russian
Church Abroad?

"First of all, that she may exist only on condition of horrible
persecution of the Russian Church in the U.S.S.R. on the part of
militant atheists, who have set themselves the aim of totally
annihilating the Church and striving by all means to achieve
this.

"Under normal conditions of life, we repeat once again, An
independent state of existence of a part of the Russian Church
outside the borders of Russia would be impossible and
unthinkable. But even now there is a limit to this (i.e.
independent) existence - the cessation of persecutions of the
Church and her freedom in Russia.

"From this we conclude, that the existence of the Russian
Church Abroad is a temporary phenomenon, conditional upon
persecutions of the Russian Church. If you like, an abnormal
condition. " (Page 61)

Fr. Alexander Lebedeff then concluded his challange with:

"[All of the emphasis in the passage quoted is from the original,
where the words marked between double asterisks appear in boldface
type].

"Those who have ears, let them hear."

"I would appreciate hearing substantive comments on this text."

"With the Love of Christ,

"Prot. Alexander Lebedeff"

I, ROAC Subdeacon Nathaniel Kapner, in no wise quailing before Fr.
Alexander Lebedeff's challenge, and having 'stripped myslef for the
contest,'hastened to reply thus:

"My dear Fr Alexander, perhaps you are unaware of the divers and
sundry stratagems of him who at will 'transforms himself into an
angel of light?'

"But we who are Anti-MP/ROCOR unia are not ignorant of Satan and
his false apostles' devices. You see Fr Alexander the devil never
sleeps and sometimes like a roaring lion, as in the first phase of
Bolshevik persecution of the Church, the collective anti-christ was
quite overt in its 'militant atheism.' This phase which can be
called 'The International Revolutionary Phase' was between the years
of 1917 unto 1943.

"Now allow me to bring you to the second phase of the Soviet
government's militant atheism' beginning in 1943 up to our present
evil times. This may be called 'The Stalinist Phase of State-ism.'

"Because Stalin's new Soviet policy was now looking inward, he and
his Politburo decided to form a 'Church' that would be an essential
part of the Soviet system and to help control the population from a
standpoint that was not present before, namely to utilize 'religion'
as an organization that would 'support' the government.

"Bishop Grabbe in the 1960's was still trying to peer into Soviet
Life from an incredibly disadvantaged lookout, namely from behind
the barrier known as "The Iron Curtain." When Bishop Grabbe of holy
memory penned these words he was still premising his assetions upon
what was true of the First Phase.

"Russian historians will tell us to a man that Russia's reality even
when viewed close up is an enigma. How much more when one is behind
a wall made of triple-thick iron! The West in 1966 had no real
information about life in the Soviet Union.

"The Old Idea which was informing Bishop Grabbe's position of
premising the Church Abroads' reason for existence because of overt
persecution had changed into a new one which he was not permitted to
see, namely the same intense hatred and persecution of religion, now
under the hoped-for guise of government 'approval.'

"Which brings us to the present. Essentially in this on-going second
phase of militant atheism, religion is used only in the interest of
maintaining control. Putin uses religion in all of its aspects
as buttressing elements for maintaining his authority. Not only for
his 'vetical power' from top down, but as an insidious power from
within the population. Soon he will wield his propped-up 'MP' for
his international designs.

"As things usually happen, the 'evolution' of Bolshevik persecution
is no longer set on the overt annihilation of the Church but
something far more pernicious and perhaps imperceptable to the
simple, namely the bolstering of a facade that appears like 'the
Church.' And this facade is for the sole purpose of supporting the
aims and intents of the government. This is what is known
as 'Sergianism.'

"And 'Sergianism' my dear Fr Alexander, is alive and well in the
Soviet Church known as "The Moscow Patriarcate." I dare say, you are
about to fall into the merciless snare of the Adversary.

"ROAC Subdeacon Nathaniel Kapner
The Eleventh Hour
October 30, 2005
St. Andrew in "The Judgment"

"P.S. I would like to thank the renowned historian and my dear friend
ROCOR Dr. Eugene L. Magerovsky for his insightful insights above. I
have simply 'dramatized' the good Doctors' analysis.

"P.P.S. Anti MP/ROCOR Dr Eugene L Magerovsky holds a 1975 Phd from
Columbia University in 'The Peoples' Commissariat Of Foreign
Affairs, 1917-1943.' He has taught Russian History at the renown
educational institutions of Forham University, Georgetown
University, and NYU.

"P.P.P.S. Dr. Magerovsky is a major contributor to the 'Fidelity'
Anti-MP/ROCOR unia Website at www.metanthonymemorial.org. I consider
myself highly privileged to call myself a co-member with the
venerable Dr Eugene Magerovsky.

Nathaniel Kapner

The Silent Voice Of +Deacon Basil (rocor)

Post by Nathaniel Kapner »

The Silent Voice Of +Deacon Basil (rocor) bronathaniel

THE FOLLOWING IS an excerpt from the "Farewell Address" of ROCOR
Protodeacon Basil Yakimov of in announcing his being banned from
posting on the Internet by his ruling bishop, ROCOR Abp Hilarion of
Australia.

Martyrs are always to be found where the Truth is proclaimed.
Protodeacon Basil was called upon last May to endure the same
injustices that our Church Martyrs were also called upon to

endure for the sake of the truth.

THE SILENT VOICE OF +DEACON BASIL YAKIMOV

"Dear All - Christ is in our midst!

Today, [May 7 2005] I received a UKASE from my Ruling Archbishop
that informs me that I have exceeded the boundaries of what is
allowable in my postings on the Internet Forums. Those on these
lists have accused me of referring to material allegedly coming from
the camp of ROCA enemies.

The material I have used has in the most been positive about
historical ROCA but it has been critical at times of the current
situation in our ROCA. I also know that my Archbishop has been under
constant pressure to silence me on the Internet.

In the Ukase it also states that I should stop posting material in
regard to religious-church questions on the receipt of the Ukase for
one year from the date of the receipt of the Ukase.

I am concerned that this Ukase is a precedent for persecution of
those faithful sons & daughters of ROCA who are not against honest
dialogue with the MP but who are against the compromises contained
in the said Documents produced so far by the dialogue...

I have no animosity towards anyone on these lists - but I do not
have a place in my heart for anyone who advocates, promotes, or
dilutes in any way or performs revision of Sergiansism & Ecumenism
so it becomes more palatable to the masses or to suit the times we
live in.

The MP delegation to the WCC has increased. The white washing of
Sergianism continues, so nothing has changed & the so called
Documents are worthless & should not be accepted at the All-
Diaspora Council on May 6-14, 2006 & the subsequent SOBOR of
BISHOPS."

I hope & pray that Archbishop Alypy & Bishops Daniel, Evtihy,
Agarfangel & Gabriel will stand firm & abandon the False Union with
the Post Soviet MP. We in ROCA are not under any duress to accept
the compromises that inevitably lead to betrayal of the Truth...

"Lord You know my love for the much suffering people of Holy Russia
& my loyalty to our ROCA, if it pleases You increase in me this love
for the enemies that have persecuted your Holy Church during the
godless Soviet debauchery, so help me Lord!

O Holy Theotokos do not forsake us in our hour of need. Shelter
ROCA with Thy most precious Protection - Most holy Theotokos, help
us!

To you - our New Martyrs & Confessors of Russia, who knew no
compromise, I now turn & ask you, from my heart which is filled
with sadness, to intercede together with our ROCA holy fathers
to our Lord Jesus Christ so He will not allow any False Union to
take place.

From this day onwards I know now why I serve in Canberra at the St
John the Forerunner Church for in silence my voice will be heard!

With all my love in our Lord Jesus Christ! Adieu!

unworthy protodeacon Basil Alexandrovich Yakimov
St John The Forerunner Church, Canberra
1700 hrs, 4 July 2005.

[This last posting was sent on 5 July 2005]

For +Protodeacon Basil Yakimov
Subdeacon Nathaniel Kapner
[For the full text please contact me at bronathaniel@...

Dr E.L. Magerovsky
Newbie
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu 17 November 2005 2:53 pm

“Full Autonomy while in Eucharistic Communion?”

Post by Dr E.L. Magerovsky »

ROCOR believes it can easily join with the Moscow Patriarchate –
“Full Autonomy while in Eucharistic Communion”

Dr. Eugene L. Magerovsky

Currently, in an apparent attempt to soothe the troubled minds of their flocks, there are those in ROCOR who are actively spreading the notion that after the two churches merge, there will be no change in the everyday life of the church and everything will be as before.

Let us examine this argument. Firstly, let us take “full autonomy.” The word itself, autonomy, denotes that, although autonomous, the part still belongs to a greater whole. In this case, we will be autonomous, but as an inseparable part of the Moscow Patriarchate. In such a situation, autonomy can be given and autonomy can be taken away. During the Grand Entry of every liturgy, the prelate for that church is commemorated, who, in this case, is the unrepentant patriarch Alexy II (better known in the KGB parlance as “comrade Drozdov”), a direct descendant of the church created by Stalin. This is known to all. Even if our church retains full autonomy, we will have to commemorate him, as he is the prelate of the Stalinist Moscow Patriarchate, an uncanonical church to which we will belong and within which we will not have any real autonomy.

Secondly, “eucharistic communion” with us will grant automatic canonical status to the Moscow Patriarchate. “Eucharistic communion” only, without recognizing its canonical legitimacy, would be possible only in one case, if the Church Abroad, with its status and with its own prelate, would deal as equals with the members of the Patriarchate, which would then make us autocephalous (ecclesiastically independent). It could be relatively advantageous for us, as it was for the Orthodox Church of America in 1970, but it would still entail granting canonical legitimacy to the Moscow Patriarchate.

In this way, “full autonomy while in eucharistic communion” is completely unacceptable for us, as it would obligate us to recognize the canonical legitimacy of an entity that is completely uncanonical, even though the Moscow Patriarchate is considered canonical by many other independent national Orthodox Churches, whether because of their lack of understanding or due to their own self-serving pursuits.

We, the parishioners and clergy of the ROCOR who are presently anti- MP, have no lack of understanding of the issues, nor do we serve our own interests. We seek only the good of our beloved Russian Church.
ELM

ROCOR Dr Eugene L. Magerovsky Ph.D; Columbia Univeristy;
Russian History & Foreign Affairs.

Post Reply