911 Revisited

ICONOPHILI · Post by **ICONOPHILI** » Sun 22 October 2006 12:57 pm

Senior Military, Intelligence, and Government
Officials Question 9/11 Commission Report

So I guess they're wrong also hu???? http://www.wanttoknow.info/officialsque ... sionreport

CGW · Post by **CGW** » Mon 23 October 2006 12:28 am

Uh, yes, they're wrong too......

ICONOPHILI · Post by **ICONOPHILI** » Tue 24 October 2006 8:16 am

CGW wrote:
Uh, yes, they're wrong too......

WRONG youre the one thats WRONG, you who can't even understand The Constitution is being fased out for some sort of "New World Order"now try and tell us these you know more than these "Military Men" :mrgreen:

CGW · Post by **CGW** » Tue 24 October 2006 10:04 am

Of course, if you look at the two-references-away original sources, as usual you are misrepresenting what they are saying. Just to take the first case: nowhere does Weldon dispute that the attacks did not take place essentially as people saw them happen. What he is disputing-- and for that matter, I would dispute it too-- is the intelligence link back to the Iraqi government. I don't feel like wasting my time checking all of these, but I expect that they are all raising the same point. I personally think that the thesis some are considering-- that the administration knew about the plans and allowed the attacks to proceed because it was politically expedient-- is not plausible without positive evidence. But you've linked to a site that basically disagrees with you.