Did Christ Laugh since laughter is a worldly passion?

Patristic theology, and traditional teachings of Orthodoxy from the Church fathers of apostolic times to the present. All forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.


Post Reply
User avatar
Mor Ephrem
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri 8 November 2002 1:11 am
Location: New York
Contact:

Post by Mor Ephrem »

Christ is risen!

Dear OOD,

OrthodoxyOrDeath wrote:

Well I think there is a difference between "could have sinned" and "did sin" (ie. having passions). I think you agree.

I would agree with the difference you posit, but would not agree that "having passions" = "did sin". The passions we struggle with, the temptations we wage spiritual battle against, all of these can lead us to sin, but experiencing them in and of themselves is not sin, or else our Lord, too, was a sinner, and we have no hope.

I think you are right when you say this about "sinful passions", except I think of it a little different than you. First, I don't believe there are always "good" versions of a passion; for instance, lust. But it is true enough that many times there are good versions of a passion, such as hate; and there are "bad" versions of virtues, such as "love". But in either case, I just don't think of a "good" version of a passion as being a "passion", I think of it as a virtue. So we have "love" which can be a virtue and "love" which can be a passion.

I suppose we could define things in this way, I've just never seen it done before.

To use your example of lust, lust is an inordinate desire for sexual pleasure. The definition seems to imply that there is an "ordinate" desire for sexual pleasure, and even in the Orthodox wedding service (which I attended most recently a few hours ago), we affirm that the marriage bed is undefiled. I don't think a husband and wife engaged or about to engage in intercourse are sinning, and neither does the Church. Clearly, there is some "holy" (for lack of a better term) opposite to lust, when it is in the proper context, and this, I would suggest, is the "good passion" which is given to us by God for the continuation of the human race. Now, if they were not married, then we know where that is going. The same could be said, I think, for any of the "passions".

So the questions becomes: did Christ laugh in the sense that it was a virtue? Can laughter be a virtue? Intially one might think "yes, of course", but I think on further reflection you you can see that laughter is really loosing control of yourself. How can we pray unceasingly when we loose control of ourselves? Always having control of oneself is a fundemental element of monasticism and Orthodoxy in general.

Now if you said Christ smiled, I would agree with that; with no teeth showing of course. :mrgreen:

Well, aside from the fact that laughter is, as others have noted, not simply and not always a loosing control of yourself which is not conducive to hesychasm, I find it interesting that I, the "monophysite" around here, am defending something which my creed is allegedly supposed to disagree with, while you (the "Orthodox") seem to be arguing for a monophysite Christ, even when you do pay lip service to the council of Chalcedon's doctrinal statements (and this is not the first time this has happened).

We certainly cannot prove that Christ laughed--nor can we prove that He didn't (St. John the Theologian tells us that there are many things we do not know about because they weren't written down). But I think it's dangerous to insist that Christ did not laugh as if it was a dogmatic issue. First, it cannot be proven (and I've already granted that the opposite cannot be proven). Second, I don't think there is any consensus that laughter is always and everywhere a sinful passion. Third, if Jesus could've sinned (and I believe this is what some of you told me some time ago), then I don't see why it would hurt your worldview to admit that Jesus "could've laughed". Saying that He definitely did not poses a contradiction.

I can sympathise with the desire to keep Jesus sacred, and not let Him be turned into "just one of the guys", as so many these days are wont to do. But, without taking it as far as they misguidedly do, there is a sense in which He did become "just one of the guys", since He is perfect man, having become incarnate for us by the Holy Spirit and the Virgin Mary. He is perfect God, of course; I'm not trying to say anything other than that we need to be careful of how much we "defend" Him, lest we find ourselves forgetting the big picture.

I would think that Christ, as a perfect man, would have been laughing a lot in his attempts to deal with the fallen men around him.

Anastasios,

Quite frankly, I think Christ would laugh at this thread. Tom's piece of satire about his son was so funny I sinned "in stitches".

OrthodoxyOrDeath

Post by OrthodoxyOrDeath »

Mor,

Third, if Jesus could've sinned (and I believe this is what some of you told me some time ago), then I don't see why it would hurt your worldview to admit that Jesus "could've laughed"

Forget about the "laughing Christ" theory for a minute, with regard to this comment: The Orthodox do say that Christ could have sinned, but we also say He didn't.

Just wanted to clarify that.

Now with regard to your other comment: "is a sense in which He did become "just one of the guys"

I don't agree with this at all, we are all fallen in our nature while Christ was perfect man – the new Adam; as man was before the fall. Yes sure, He had a nose and a mouth, "just like one of the guys", but the similarities end about there. The difference between man from before the fall and man after the fall is not physical, it is in the behavior, the mood, action and thought.

So I think I have said just about all I have to say, and I don't want to just be arguing the subject. If I have offended anyone please forgive me.

User avatar
joasia
Protoposter
Posts: 1858
Joined: Tue 29 June 2004 7:19 pm
Jurisdiction: RTOC
Location: Montreal

Post by joasia »

CHRIST IS RISEN!

Rejoicing, and laughing meaninglessly (as a goof) are two different things.

This is the laughter I was referring to. Romiosini used the word meaninglessly, I used the word idiocy.

Please forgive me, if I have caused anyone to sin, with my bad choice of words. I'm just very concerned about the judgement I will face, when I die. It has made me become much more serious about how I view life.

Joanna

Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me. (Ps. 50)

User avatar
CGW
Member
Posts: 389
Joined: Tue 18 November 2003 4:30 pm

Not exactly

Post by CGW »

OrthodoxyOrDeath wrote:

Here is a list of the Passions by Saint Peter of Damaskos....
http://www.orthodox.net/confess/a-list- ... sions.html

Well, not exactly. The passage in question is not a list at all, but rather a discussion in which various passions are listed. Laughter is indeed mentioned, but very briefly and almost as a footnote to a discussion of other acts.

Western writers are more specific and distinguish different sorts of laughter/humor. For example, C.S.Lewis in The Screwtape Letters distinguishes between "Joy, Fun, the Joke Proper, and Flippancy"-- all of which include laughter. (He holds joy and fun to be basically good, the joke to be marginal, and flippancy to be bad.) At any rate, mere inclusion in a list isn't a good enough justification, and when I read the passage from the Philokalia as a whole it suggests to me, at any rate, that the attack upon laughter is a far more reprehensible passion than mere laughter.

User avatar
CGW
Member
Posts: 389
Joined: Tue 18 November 2003 4:30 pm

Post by CGW »

joasia wrote:

Why would anybody think that Christ laughed? Laughter is due to a mental state of idiocy...an idiocy that is a quality present in created man due to their influence by the prince of this world.

Laughter is more often a reaction to idiocy, in my experience.

User avatar
joasia
Protoposter
Posts: 1858
Joined: Tue 29 June 2004 7:19 pm
Jurisdiction: RTOC
Location: Montreal

Post by joasia »

CHRIST IS RISEN!

CGW

Laughter is more often a reaction to idiocy, in my experience.

Laughter is also the result of sarcasm, from what I've witnessed.

Create in me a clean heart, O God, and renew a right spirit within me. (Ps. 50)

spyridon

Passions-laughter,eating,etc.

Post by spyridon »

You know story`s of the Holy Fathers are such an inspiration to a Christ -like life....for instance in the 20th century a very neat story of Father Seraphim Rose, it goes like this.....it was on a hot day at the monastery of St.Herman of Alaska in Platina,and the Fathers(Seraphim and Herman)had there normal flock of visitors..this day after lunch the kids(teenagers) all served a scoop of ice cream to about 8 people plus the Fathers only Father Seraphim rose was given a scoop of mash potatoes instead of the scoop of vanilla ice cream that everybody else received...everybody was eating and just eyeing Fr.Seraphim and to there surprise he didnt even flinch,he ate his scoop of mashed potatoes and proved that Food was Food and of this world...Fr.Herman said that at the first couple of bites that Fr.Seraphim winked at him as to say"let the kids have there fun,I know you all are eating ice cream"....
Fr.Seraphim Rose ate but would eat very little and with no salt,pepper,sauces,etc...it could be the worst food but he definetly was at that Christ-Like sense............another passion he would advise all visitors to refrain from was Whistling,this not only was a passion but also stirred up demons and called them to start trouble...........

Post Reply