The Erika Kirk thing, Elites etc

This forum is for polite discussion of political and social topics that may be uncomfortable for inquirers and some members. This includes anything politically charged, conspiracy theories, and/or end-times theories. All Forum Rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
Cyprian
Sr Member
Posts: 760
Joined: Sat 12 November 2005 6:40 am
Faith: True Orthodox Christianity
Contact:

Re: The Erika Kirk thing, Elites etc

Post by Cyprian »

Also, another thing that would seem to disqualify Harry, is that the Church Fathers say the Antichrist will be reared in secret. It's hard to see how Prince Harry, whose life has been very public, could qualify as being reared in secret.

However, as I've mentioned before, (I can't recall exactly if it was also on this forum, or only my social media), there is a film which is cryptically but obviously (at least to me) all about the Antichrist, as well as Princess Diana and what happened to her, that addresses this very issue.

It's called Twins (1988), and it was no accident that they chose the premiere for December 8, the Papist feast of the Immaculate Conception. There is a deliberate significance to this, as it relates to the plot of the film.

Twins (1988 film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twins_(1988_film)

As everyone can read in the plot, there is a secret government experiment carried out at a genetics laboratory, to produce the perfect child. (obviously the Antichrist). They have selected one woman to be the mother, but six different fathers, who've been selected because of their superior genetics, intelligence, etc.

The experiment accidentally produces twin boys. Arnold Schwarzenegger is the one endowed with the superior qualities, and Danny DeVito is like the runt, the accidental genetic leftovers.

One of the reasons they chose the actor Danny, is because the Antichrist is to come from the tribe of Dan. Are you beginning to see how this film is all about a secret plan to conceive the Antichrist?

So, Danny DeVito is living in the world, and is a thief and a scoundrel and has all the bad qualities. Arnold, on the other hand, is raised in secret by a scientist/professor on an island away from the world until the age of 35 (close to the age the Antichrist will be when he becomes manifest).

Arnold, not being tainted by living in the world, has all the good qualities. He is kind and naive, and unassuming, and he has read many books, so he is scholarly and full of wisdom, and a superior physical specimen, and such. He is also of course, a virgin, being isolated on an island, with no women around.

Take note, that when he leaves the island to find the brother he never knew about, he finds his brother, and they both start dating sisters, whose last name is Mason. So, they start dating the "Masons".

Hieromartyr Andronik of Perm (+1918):

"In the end Masonry will be poured out into one man of iniquity, the son of destruction - the Antichrist."

So, it's obvious why the occultists in Hollywood who wrote the script, gave these ladies the name of Mason.

Arnold and DeVito's characters, their surname is Benedict, obviously alluding to Pope Benedict, since there is evidence indicating that the apostate pope will be a father of the Antichrist.

The other important thing to note, is that Arnold is always coming to the rescue to save his brother, who is always getting into trouble.

This is obviously to show that Arnold is the "savior" like the Antichrist pretends to be Jesus, which means savior.

To make this short and to the point, the twins come to find out that they were lied to about their mother, when they were told she was dead. They seek her out and eventually come to learn that she is living away from the world in obscurity, in an artist colony.

They go on a road trip to find her, and when they get to the artist colony, they speak to their mother, Mary Ann Benedict, not realizing it's her, and she lies and does not tell her twin sons who she is, and says that Mary Ann Benedict passed away.

So you see, this is for Princess Diana lying and pretending to be dead and secretly living somewhere in obscurity.

I am just briefly covering a few points. There are many more indications that this is referring to Diana. I could delve into much greater detail, if only anyone showed any interest.

For example, since I have made the assertion that many Arnold Schwarzenegger films are revealing the secret society's grooming of Elon Musk, I could explain how this Arnold film is also about Elon and Tesla.

Then we could explore how the film Junior (1994), once again a pairing of the same actors, Arnold and DeVito, by the same film director, is also all about the conception of the Antichrist, harvesting Diana's eggs, IVF, and Elon Musk.

Junior (1994 film)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Junior_(1994_film)

You see, it is claimed that Elon Musk has fathered many children via IVF.

Elon Musk's Babies Were Conceived Via IVF And Surrogacy
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexzhavor ... roduction/

So, is it any wonder that Arnold is in the film Junior (1994), which is all about IVF?

Did I not declare plainly, without any wavering or hesitancy, that Arnold films are all about Elon Musk, long before the world would come to learn of him and Tesla?

Musk obsessed with traveling to Mars ... Arnold in film Total Recall obsessed with going to Mars
Musk company Tesla focused on building A.I. robots (Optimus) ... Arnold is an A.I. robot in the Terminator film series. (which I have also explained on multiple occasions are all about Diana and her faked death in a car crash). Musk admits he has watched Terminator 2 more than 7 times.
Then there's the film Junior (1994), where Arnold is involved with conceiving a baby using Diana's eggs and IVF.

Elon Musk and Shivon Zilis conceived twins through IVF
https://nypost.com/2022/08/26/elon-musk ... vf-report/

The film Rain Man (1988) was also released in theaters at the exact same time as Twins (1988) (within a few days of each other), and I have also proved Hollywood's cunning collusion, in that films are not made independently and in isolation, but are all purposefully and deliberately associated to one another, to cryptically form a larger coherent narrative.

The films Twins and Rain Man released at the exact same time, have many identical plot elements. I've written about all of this before.

Here are just a few hors d'oeuvres to see if I can stimulate the appetite:

In Rain Man, no one told Tom Cruise he had a brother.
In Twins, no one told Arnold he had a brother.

In Rain Man, Tom Cruise is broke and needs money to pay off his debts.
In Twins, DeVito is broke and in debt to people and needs money to pay off his debt.

In Rain Man, Tom Cruise sells exotic Italian luxury cars.
In Twins, Danny DeVito steals luxury cars

In Rain Man and Twins, both pairs of brothers go on a long cross country road trip together.

In Rain Man and Twins, both pairs of brothers get fitted for fancy clothes/suits, shown side by side in matching sport coats and shirts.

In Rain Man and Twins, one brother teaches the other brother how to dance for their first date. Neither Rain Man nor Arnold's character in Twins has ever been with a woman.

In Rain Man Cruise wears a pinky ring. In Twins, DeVito wears a pinky ring.

Raymond ("Rain Man") saves Tom Cruise from his money woes.
In Twins, Arnold saves his brother Vincent from money woes.
They are both "virgin" saviors, in imitation of Jesus Christ.

Hollywood does stuff like this ALL the time. Most people are simply oblivious to it.

Is it merely a coincidence that Arnold appeared in his film debut in Hercules in New York (1970), and Danny DeVito would also appear in Hercules (1997)?

Is it merely a coincidence that Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan were paired together in three different romantic comedies? No!

Do you want to know why? Everyone knows Hank is a nickname for Henry. As in the famous baseball slugger Henry "Hank" Aaron. Prince Harry's formal name is Henry, i.e. Hank.

Meghan Markle is known to go by "Meg" for short.

So, actor Hanks paired with the actress Meg is for Prince Henry (Hank/Harry) and Meg Markle. Their so-called marriage is totally fake and scripted, and was arranged for them in advance, just like William and Kate's and Charles and Diana, and the Charles and Camilla.

Please don't fall for the propaganda and lies disseminated in the media that Charles has always been in love with Camilla.

Charles isn't in love with Camilla any more than Charlie Kirk was in love with Erika! Folks would do well to not be so naive and trusting of these chronic and habitual liars. These people are not the least bit normal, and they do not have normally ordered passions!

User avatar
Barbara
Archon
Posts: 5211
Joined: Sat 29 September 2012 6:03 pm

Re: The Erika Kirk thing, Elites etc

Post by Barbara »

Wow, that's incredible !

Let me ask you, then : why was Charles placed with Camilla ? I DID believe that fiction until this very minute !

Post Reply