Gregory wrote:Dear Ania --
Thanks for the reply. Being in communion, however, implies that one accepts the teaching and practices of the church in which one is now in communion with. For example, do most members of the ROCOR accept and condone the use of the New Calendar and the EP's ecumenical activities?
- ROCOR back in the day ordained a whole bunch of Romanian New Calendar bishops for Romanian New Calendar communities. They have had New Calendar parishes. It is much like ROCOR now having an Old Believer bishop for an Old Believer flock up in Eire PA. Switching to the New Calendar was on the discussion agenda for the Council of 1918, however it was not brought up due to the Revolution. They were also to discuss switching to just plain Russian rather than Church Slavonic in church services. They never got the chance to resolve it, and it became a non-issue.
- Do you mean the EP or the MP? Ecumenism, tough thing to sort out. Do you mean full-blown out co-serving? Or being treated as an honored guest at their rituals & treating them with honor when they come to our rituals? Or working together on social projects with other denominations for the betterment of their mutual communities? Or simply being polite? The fact that the MP hasn't officially withdrawn from the WCC is of course troubling. However, it is already acknowledged by most people in the MP as wrong. It just needs a little bit of jolting to have them officially leave. As we have given them no guarantees, I think they might be keeping it as a bargaining chip, after all, these might be church politics, but they are still politics.