St. John on Breaking Communion

Patristic theology, and traditional teachings of Orthodoxy from the Church fathers of apostolic times to the present. All forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.


Post Reply
Justin Kissel

St. John on Breaking Communion

Post by Justin Kissel »

“We must stand firmly on the foundation of the Church’s canons and not with those who are straying from them. In former times for the exposure of canonical irregularities in a Local Church canonical communion was broken with her. The Russian Church Abroad cannot act in this way, in so far as her status has not been clearly defined. For this reason she must not break communion with the other Churches, if they do not take this step first. But, while maintaining communion, [the Church Abroad] must not remain silent over violations against the righteousness of the Church” - St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5127
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

When was this said?

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

Was this written before ROCOR broke communion with the EP over the lifting of the anathemas?

Justin Kissel

Post by Justin Kissel »

Yes, it was written in 1939. The entire article that I got the quote from can be read here.

User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

Interestingly, the EP also commemorate St. John of Shanghai and San Francisco on their calendar.
Holy Father John, intercede for us all!

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

User avatar
Nektarios
Jr Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun 28 November 2004 4:39 pm

Post by Nektarios »

I wouldnt be supprised if the EP commorated Jesse Jackson...

User avatar
George Australia
Sr Member
Posts: 671
Joined: Sat 17 January 2004 9:26 am
Location: Down Under (Australia, not Hades)

Post by George Australia »

Nektarios wrote:

I wouldnt be supprised if the EP commorated Jesse Jackson...

Nektarios,
From what you have been saying about leaving the Antiochians, you are currently making decisions concerning the Salvation of your soul..... I hope these decisions are based on objective facts and not subjective emotions as indicated by the above quote- we cannot afford to be that frivolous with our salvation.
Let's talk facts, Nektarios. Why is it that you "wouldnt be supprised if the EP commorated Jesse Jackson...(sic)"? Do you not agree with the Glorification or Commemoration of a particular Saint in the EP? If so, whom have they Glorified or Commemorate that you do not consider a Saint?
Have the courage of your convictions to tell us who the EP has Glorified or Commemorates in error.
If we can't back up something with facts, then we shouldn't say it, because it is passing judgement, idle gossiping and cowardly.
If nothing else, remember this Nektarios: there are no "throw away lines". There is an Eye which sees everything, and an Ear which hears everything, and a Book which records everything we say and do.

George

"As long as it depends on Monothelitism, then Miaphysitism is nothing but a variant of Monophysitism."

Post Reply