orthodoxinfo.com

[OrthodoxyOrDeath]

I noticed someone mentioned some months back that the individual who runs orthodoxinfo.com left the Cyprians and joined the ROCOR. Since then I have noticed the introduction of a "new calendar" menaion, pilgrimages to ecumenist monasteries, articles supporting the MP, and other subtle changes. I guess I am now wondering just how subtle they are, and if they will stay subtle. Will all the articles describing and supporting the Cyprianite position be removed at some point (maybe they are already slowly being removed?). Not that I agree with the Cyprianites strange ecclesiology, but their publications which were hosted at this site did at least offer many good insights.

Too bad.

http://orthodoxinfo.com

[Nektarios]

I noticed that too and thought it was a little strange for that once great site.

[Priest Siluan]

Then the Webmasters little by little takes character "Subtle" of ROCOR-L. Another question is that "politically" ROCOR-L doesn't need to be in communion with Metropolita Kiprianos since ROCOR-L if they enter in communion with MP, they can have problems with the official churches where the Synod Kiprianita is (Greece, Rumania and Bulgaria).

That is to say, apparently, the gradual distancing between ROCOR-L and M. Kiprianos is not the eclessiology but one reason "jurisdictional."

[Maria]

Then the Webmasters little by little takes character "Subtle" of ROCOR-L. Another question is that "politically" ROCOR-L doesn't need to be in communion with Metropolita Kiprianos since ROCOR-L if they enter in communion with MP, they can have problems with the official churches where the Synod Kiprianita is (Greece, Rumania and Bulgaria).

That is to say, apparently, the gradual distancing between ROCOR-L and M. Kiprianos is not the eclessiology but one reason "jurisdictional."

What does ROCOR-L stand for ? Has the ROCOR branched into two jurisdictions?

[Liudmilla]

ROCOR_L is under MET Lavra

ROCOR_V is under Met VITALY

Take you pick............

Milla

[romiosini]

I noticed someone mentioned some months back that the individual who runs orthodoxinfo.com left the Cyprians and joined the ROCOR. Since then I have noticed the introduction of a "new calendar" menaion, pilgrimages to ecumenist monasteries, articles supporting the MP, and other subtle changes. I guess I am now wondering just how subtle they are, and if they will stay subtle. Will all the articles describing and supporting the Cyprianite position be removed at some point (maybe they are already slowly being removed?). Not that I agree with the Cyprianites strange ecclesiology, but their publications which were hosted at this site did at least offer many good insights.

Too bad.

http://orthodoxinfo.com

Forgive me OOD, define me what means Ecumenist Monasteries. I can understand Ecumenist Bishops, but not the terminology "Ecumenist Monasteries". Of course, there is a limit to this anti-ecumenist zeal, which we should be careful on how we see things. If you can tell me what makes these photos of the monasteries Ecumenist then I can accept this terminology. Also, who said the moderator of the site has removed the traditionalist articles? What is this excuse to promote rumors? There aren't any missing articles of anti-ecumenistic movement. Contrary, there is more and more anti-ecumenist articles now then when it had when it just opened the site. How beautiful it is to see the photos of wonderful monasteries...

I see nothing here that is Ecumenist.

Wait, isn't this the tomb of Blessed Father Seraphim Rose? Of course, Ecumenists can't stand the fact that Father Seraphim left so many anti-ecumenist writings. But, wait, is this monastery ecumenist?

Let the people see these photos, and make a judgement for themselves.

[尼古拉前执事]

There aren't any missing articles of anti-ecumenistic movement.

Dear Romiosini, actually I wrote Patrick and he removed a large chunk of articles because his opinion had changed on the Resistance movement.