ICONOPHILI wrote:My Spiritual Father is the Main resean I have found out these things ARE true, You seem to think I believe these things based on "BlindFaith"(.)
What you seem to mean is, you listened to your spiritual father (who is of course also unqualified to hold an opinion anyway-- he's a cleric, not a historian) and looked at a bunch of crackpot sites, and didn't bother to read anything from a legitimate site or appraoch what you did read with any skepticism. So yes, you do approach this with "blind faith"-- faith in sources which do not merit it.
if there is no conspirousy, the U.S. Gov would not be breaking the Constitution to bring U.S. to a total POLICE state in descise as "war on terror"(.)
Ah, but you are neglecting a far more likely scenario. Governments are, by their nature, predisposed to enlarge and impose more control and in general become more despotic. Even if the government didn't have any involvement in making this happen, it was a ready-made excuse to increase "security" and take actions which ordinarily it would impossible to justify or get away with.
And that is the explanation that has prevailed. The government didn't do these acts, but it found in them excuses to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and to ignore a lot of constitutional prohibitions.
tell him to go to the Little store across the street and ask the Pakistani owner what happed 5 minutes after the thing hit the Pentagon
So- maybe- they took a security tape. Big deal. It doesn't mean anything.
Unless the equation is "Not believing in the conspiracy theories/agreeing with Iconophilli" = "Heathen".