Is Jesus YHWH in the flesh?

Patristic theology, and traditional teachings of Orthodoxy from the Church fathers of apostolic times to the present. All forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.


The Apostate

Post by The Apostate »

Joasia, you are, of course, correct.

However, I wouldn't be too harsh on our brother/sister. Each of us comes to the Faith from a different background and catechuman may well still be at a point where (s)he is still coming to an acceptance of these things. Surely, this is partly what the catechumenate is about.

I made the point above about the Liturgy being theological. The beautiful thing about having a set Liturgy which has been used by generations of Saints and sinners before us, and is used by the Faithful around the world, is that we are repeating the same words week by week, having the Faith contained therein ingrained in our hearts each time we say the words. Perhaps each week a different word or phrase sticks out and causes us to think about what it means. Perhaps somebody new to the Faith isn't sure about the exact details of the meaning behind it, and when it is challenged by another group (in this case, the Gnostics), isn't sure how to respond or what to think. This is where we support one another.

Indeed, my parish priest pointed out to me, that, in one sense, the catechumenate never really ends. Long after we are baptised and chrismated, we are still for ever learning about, and maturing in, the Faith.

I think it shows a lot of faith on the part of our fellow-poster, catechuman, that (s)he was able to spit upon Satan and say the Creed, even without fully understanding it. It shows that (s)he accepts that the Faith is true, regardless of how limited our understanding of it is. I admire that, and pray for catechuman's (and all of our) further maturity in the Faith.

AndyHolland
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue 1 November 2005 5:43 pm

Post by AndyHolland »

Our friend the Catechuman is going through a rough time precisely because he has spit on Satan and Satan has loosed all hell against him.

Also, I don't know anything really - as a Christian I am profoundly ignorant. The Saints such as St. John Chrysostom and St. Maximos the confessor say the same thing. Our blind spots are all different, and what we think we know we really don't know.

With the Divine Liturgy, with the Holy Scripture, with the Saints and prayers and all the weapons of goodness - one moves toward the truth, but to know the full truth in our little heads - and to what depth? It is better to know nothing and be astounded and joyful as the Lord leads us from truth to truth, beauty to beauty. What we know only is the path to follow, not the content of the beauty that awaits on the path.

We should not be suprised when others don't see the same things we do, but rather if we build one another up - then we all move from truth to truth following the path of truth - the Word Jesus Christ in all fullness.

andy holland
sinner

AndyHolland
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue 1 November 2005 5:43 pm

Post by AndyHolland »

Another good source of real information against the Gnostics can be found in St. Irenaeus in 180AD, selections of which are found in:

http://www.ccel.org/ccel/richardson/fat ... i.iii.html

Since there are so many clear testimonies, we should not seek from others for the truth which can easily be received from the Church. There the apostles, like a rich man making a deposit; fully bestowed upon her all that belongs to the truth, so that whoever wishes may receive from her the water of life. She is the entrance to life; all the others are thieves and robbers. Therefore we ought to avoid them, but to love with the greatest zeal the things of the Church, and so to lay hold of the tradition of the truth.

Consider his proof of Apostolic succession until his time:

When the blessed apostles had founded and built up the Church, they handed over the ministry of the episcopate to Linus. Paul mentions this Linus in his Epistles to Timothy. Anencletus succeeded him. After him Clement received the lot of the episcopate in the third place from the apostles: He 373had seen the apostles and associated with them, and still had their preaching sounding in his ears and their tradition before his eyes—and not he alone, for there were many still left in his time who had been taught by the apostles. In this Clement's time no small discord arose among the brethren in Corinth, and the Church in Rome sent a very powerful letter to the Corinthians, leading them to peace, renewing their faith, and declaring the tradition which they had recently received from the apostles, which declared one almighty God, maker of heaven and earth and fashioner of man, who brought about the Deluge, and called Abraham; who brought out the people from the land of Egypt; who spoke with Moses; who ordained the Law and sent the Prophets; and who has prepared fire for the devil and his angels. Those who care to can learn from this Writing that he was proclaimed by the churches as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and so understand the apostolic tradition of the Church, since this Epistle is older than those present false teachers who make up lies about another God above the Demiurge and maker of all these things that are.1014 Evarestus succeeded to this Clement, and Alexander to Evarestus; then Xystus was installed as the sixth from the apostles, and after him Telesphorus, who met a glorious martyrdom;1015 then Hyginus, then Pius, and after him Anicetus. Soter followed Anicetus, and Eleutherus now in the twelfth place from the apostles holds the lot of the episcopate. In this very order and succession the apostolic tradition in the Church and the preaching of the truth has come down even to us. This is a full demonstration that it is one and the same life-giving faith which had been preserved in the Church from the apostles to the present, and is handed on in truth.

Similarly Polycarp, who not only was taught by apostles, and associated with many who had seen Christ, but was installed by apostles for Asia, as bishop in the church in Smyrna—I saw him myself in my early youth—survived for a long time, and departed this life in a ripe old age by a glorious and magnificent martyrdom. He always taught what he learned from the apostles, which the Church continues to hand on, and 374which are the only truths. The churches in Asia all bear witness to this, as do those who have succeeded Polycarp down to the present time; he is certainly a much more trustworthy and dependable witness than Valentinus and Marcion and the other false thinkers. When he visited Rome under Anicetus, he converted many of the above-mentioned heretics to the Church of God, proclaiming that he had received from the apostles the one and only truth, the same which is handed on by the Church. There are those who have heard him tell how when John the disciple of the Lord went to bathe at Ephesus, and saw Cerinthus inside, he rushed out of the bath without washing, but crying out, "Let us escape, lest the bath should fall while Cerinthus the enemy of the truth is in it." Polycarp himself, when Marcion once met him and said, "Do you know us?" answered, "I know you, the first-born of Satan." The apostles and their disciples took such great care not even to engage in conversations with the corrupters of the truth, as Paul also said, "A heretical man after a first and second warning avoid, knowing that such a man has fallen away and is a sinner, being self-condemned."1016 There is also a very powerful letter of Polycarp addressed to the Philippians, from which those who care to, and are concerned for their own salvation, can learn the character of his faith and [his] preaching of the truth. The church in Ephesus also, which was founded by Paul, and where John survived until the time of Trajan, is a true witness of the tradition of the apostles.

So we have very real, primary sources of information that thoroughly expose the Gnostics - and these men were taught by those who spoke to and knew the Apostles personally - not long removed. St. Irenaeus saw and heard St. Polycarp himself!

andy holland
sinner

catechuman
Newbie
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon 19 December 2005 3:42 pm

Post by catechuman »

Greetings,
When I read the Nicene Creed it does not come right out and say that Christ is the the God of the OT in the flesh. Also, I have read some comments from other Orthodox (?) which claim that YHWH is the same as Allah. I have also spoken to an Armenian Orthodox deacon in NYC who has told me that Christ was not the Messiah of the OT and has more connection with the saviour of Mithraism. So I thought I would ask and make sure there was not some patristic commentary on this specific item I presented. On the note of patristics we have St. Jerome who is against Icons, yet he is viewed as a Saint. Is he wrong? I want to fully understand these items, so I ask those more experienced. My priest has told me right up front that is not much of a Theologian. One thing I do know is that I want to pursue Theosis and that Christ is the way for me. I have come to this realization having been a protestant, having left that once I found them to be wanting and in error, then rejecting the Bible all together (due to lack of understanding), then looking into Hinduism only to find Orthodoxy, which I never even knew existed. After reading chapter 4 of "path to salvation" from St. Theophan the Recluse I melted. So my path to Orthodoxy has been a long one and I am glad to end the search and get on with the work. I admit there are some nagging questions I ponder so I seek more experienced Orthodox for comment. The comments given to me here have been quite helpful. In fact, I still have a few other questions I hope to get some comments on. Stay tuned!

God Bless,
C

User avatar
尼古拉前执事
Archon
Posts: 5127
Joined: Thu 24 October 2002 7:01 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: Non-Phylitist
Location: United States of America
Contact:

Post by 尼古拉前执事 »

catechuman wrote:

I have read some comments from other Orthodox (?) which claim that YHWH is the same as Allah. I have also spoken to an Armenian Orthodox deacon in NYC who has told me that Christ was not the Messiah of the OT and has more connection with the saviour of Mithraism.

Crazy! On the saints, remember that they are not infalliable and can be in error and that is why we are a concilliar Church going by the consensus of the Church Fathers.

AndyHolland
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue 1 November 2005 5:43 pm

Post by AndyHolland »

catechuman wrote:

Greetings,
When I read the Nicene Creed it does not come right out and say that Christ is the the God of the OT in the flesh. Also, I have read some comments from other Orthodox (?) which claim that YHWH is the same as Allah. I have also spoken to an Armenian Orthodox deacon in NYC who has told me that Christ was not the Messiah of the OT and has more connection with the saviour of Mithraism.

Run from that man (the Armenian Deacon) as you would from a viper. I am deadly serious. He is espousing Marcionism and Gnosticism and is not Christian. I once was involved in such things in my early youth - trust me, run! It will infect and destroy your mind like a deadly virus.

Read St. Irenaus (around AD 180) and consider the proof of his proximity to the Apostles themselves - highlighted below:

The tradition of the apostles, made clear in all the world, can be clearly seen in every church by those who wish to behold the truth. We can enumerate those who were established by the apostles as bishops in the churches, and their successors down to our time, none of whom taught or thought of anything like their mad ideas. Even if the apostles had known of hidden mysteries, which they taught to the perfect secretly and apart from others, they would have landed them down especially to those to whom they were entrusting the churches themselves. For they certainly wished those wham they were leaving as their successors, handing over to them their own teaching position, to be perfect and irreproachable, since their sound conduct would be a great benefit [to the Church], and failure on their part the greatest calamity. But since it would be very long in such a volume as this to enumerate the successions of all the churches, I can by pointing out the tradition which that very great, oldest, and well-known Church, founded and established at Rome by those two most glorious apostles Peter and Paul, received from the apostles, and its faith known among men, which comes down to us through the successions of bishops, put to shame all of those who in any way, either through wicked self-conceit, or through vainglory, or through blind and evil opinion, gather as they should not. For every church must be in harmony with this Church because of its outstanding pre-eminence, that is, the faithful from everywhere, since the apostolic tradition is preserved in it by those from everywhere.

When the blessed apostles had founded and built up the Church, they handed over the ministry of the episcopate to Linus. Paul mentions this Linus in his Epistles to Timothy. Anencletus succeeded him. After him Clement received the lot of the episcopate in the third place from the apostles: He had seen the apostles and associated with them, and still had their preaching sounding in his ears and their tradition before his eyes—and not he alone, for there were many still left in his time who had been taught by the apostles. In this Clement's time no small discord arose among the brethren in Corinth, and the Church in Rome sent a very powerful letter to the Corinthians, leading them to peace, renewing their faith, and declaring the tradition which they had recently received from the apostles, which declared one almighty God, maker of heaven and earth and fashioner of man, who brought about the Deluge, and called Abraham; who brought out the people from the land of Egypt; who spoke with Moses; who ordained the Law and sent the Prophets; and who has prepared fire for the devil and his angels. Those who care to can learn from this Writing that he was proclaimed by the churches as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and so understand the apostolic tradition of the Church, since this Epistle is older than those present false teachers who make up lies about another God above the Demiurge and maker of all these things that are.1014 Evarestus succeeded to this Clement, and Alexander to Evarestus; then Xystus was installed as the sixth from the apostles, and after him Telesphorus, who met a glorious martyrdom;1015 then Hyginus, then Pius, and after him Anicetus. Soter followed Anicetus, and Eleutherus now in the twelfth place from the apostles holds the lot of the episcopate. In this very order and succession the apostolic tradition in the Church and the preaching of the truth has come down even to us. This is a full demonstration that it is one and the same life-giving faith which had been preserved in the Church from the apostles to the present, and is handed on in truth.

Similarly Polycarp, who not only was taught by apostles, and associated with many who had seen Christ, but was installed by apostles for Asia, as bishop in the church in Smyrna—I saw him myself in my early youth—survived for a long time, and departed this life in a ripe old age by a glorious and magnificent martyrdom. He always taught what he learned from the apostles, which the Church continues to hand on, and which are the only truths. The churches in Asia all bear witness to this, as do those who have succeeded Polycarp down to the present time; he is certainly a much more trustworthy and dependable witness than Valentinus and Marcion and the other false thinkers. When he visited Rome under Anicetus, he converted many of the above-mentioned heretics to the Church of God, proclaiming that he had received from the apostles the one and only truth, the same which is handed on by the Church. There are those who have heard him tell how when John the disciple of the Lord went to bathe at Ephesus, and saw Cerinthus inside, he rushed out of the bath without washing, but crying out, "Let us escape, lest the bath should fall while Cerinthus the enemy of the truth is in it." Polycarp himself, when Marcion once met him and said, "Do you know us?" answered, "I know you, the first-born of Satan." The apostles and their disciples took such great care not even to engage in conversations with the corrupters of the truth, as Paul also said, "A heretical man after a first and second warning avoid, knowing that such a man has fallen away and is a sinner, being self-condemned."There is also a very powerful letter of Polycarp addressed to the Philippians, from which those who care to, and are concerned for their own salvation, can learn the character of his faith and [his] preaching of the truth. The church in Ephesus also, which was founded by Paul, and where John survived until the time of Trajan, is a true witness of the tradition of the apostles.

Since there are so many clear testimonies, we should not seek from others for the truth which can easily be received from the Church. [Please go to Church] There the apostles, like a rich man making a deposit; fully bestowed upon her all that belongs to the truth, so that whoever wishes may receive from her the water of life. She is the entrance to life; all the others are thieves and robbers.1017 Therefore we ought to avoid them, but to love with the greatest zeal the things of the Church, and so to lay hold of the tradition of the truth. What if there should be a dispute about some matter of moderate importance? Should we not turn to the oldest churches, where the apostles themselves were known, and find out from them the clear and certain answer to the problem now being raised? Even if the apostles had not left their Writings to us, ought we not to follow the rule of the tradition which they handed down to those to whom they committed the churches? Many barbarian peoples who believe in Christ follow this rule, having [the message of their] salvation written in their hearts by the Spirit without paper and ink. Diligently following the old tradition, they believe in one God, maker of heaven and earth and of all that is in them, through Christ Jesus the Son of God, who on account of his abundant love for his creation submitted to be born of a virgin, himself by himself uniting man to God, and having suffered under Pontius Pilate, and risen, and having been received up into splendor, is to come in glory as the Saviour of those who are saved, and the judge of those who are judged, and will send into eternal fire those who alter the truth, and despise his Father and his coming. Those who believe in this faith without written documents are barbarians in our speech, but in their convictions, habits, and behavior they are, because of their faith, most wise, and are pleasing to God, living in all righteousness and purity and wisdom. If anyone should preach to them the inventions of the heretics, speaking in their own language, they would at once stop their ears and run far, far away, not enduring even to listen to such blasphemous speech. So by that old tradition of the apostles they do not even take into their minds whatever their impressive words may mean.

Nor do they have any proper congregation or established teaching.

For there were no Valentinians before Valentinus, or Marcionites before Marcion; nor were there any of these perverse thinkers whom I have listed above before the founders and inventors of their perversity. For Valentinus came to Rome under Hyginus; he flourished under Pius and remained until [the time of] Anicetus. Cerdon, who was Marcion's predecessor, used to come into the Church under Hyginus and make his confession, reaching the point where he would now give his secret teaching, now make his confession in public, and then was convicted of his evil teachings and was separated from the assembly of the brethren. Marcion, who followed him, flourished under Anicetus, who held the tenth place in the series of bishops. As we have shown, the others who are called Gnostics began with Menander, the disciple of Simon, and each has as his father and chief the one whose opinions he followed. All of these rebelled in their apostasy much later [than the founding of the Church], in the midst of the Church's history.


Please, read St. Irenaus, read St. Polycarp, read St. Ignatius of Antioch. Note that there were many great Pope Saints until the schism, 800 years after Irenaus.

Yes, Allah is the Arab word for God, however, for the sake of Muslims who are human beings and whom we love, we do not confess Allah in front of them so they will not be confused, but rather God as Holy Trinity so that even if they torture us, in death we have born them the witness of true love, of true Christ, who so loved us he gave himself for us that we might be born again to God.

Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me - a sinner!

andy holland
sinner

Last edited by AndyHolland on Thu 16 March 2006 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
AndyHolland
Member
Posts: 388
Joined: Tue 1 November 2005 5:43 pm

Post by AndyHolland »

Read about St. Polycarp:

http://www.comeandseeicons.com/pha19.htm

Consider the prayer of his friend, St. Ignatios of Antioch:

http://www.antiochian.org/dynamis/1075352400.html

Consider these ancient writings of the Fathers:

http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-01/anf ... 911_166347

St. Polycarp to the Phillipians as mentioned above:
http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-01/anf ... 770_145457

http://www.ccel.org/fathers2/ANF-01/anf ... 093_206499

Especially, consider the witness of the antiquity of the sources, the consistency with which they present the Orthodox faith, and how they expose imposters, such as the purveyor of Gnostic Marconism (the Armenian Deacon whom you report saying the Jesus is not the Messiah of the OT).

Read also in Holy Scripture, the Epistle of St. Jude.

There really is nothing new under the Son as King Solomon said, and all the old wolf heresies are around today in fresh sheep's clothing - but its the same old spiritual wolf.

You are in our prayers. Please just say over and over again, Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God, have mercy on me, a sinner! Jesus Christ is Lord! Jesus is Lord totally, from Alpha to Omega, the beginning to ending - yesterday, today and forever.

andy holland
sinner

Post Reply