St. Theophan the Recluse on the New Calendar

Patristic theology, and traditional teachings of Orthodoxy from the Church fathers of apostolic times to the present. All forum Rules apply. No polemics. No heated discussions. No name-calling.


Post Reply
User avatar
drewmeister2
Member
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun 21 August 2005 8:45 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: GOC/HOTCA
Location: Arizona
Contact:

St. Theophan the Recluse on the New Calendar

Post by drewmeister2 »

Archbishop Theophan on the new calendar.

Code: Select all

 In 1926, Archbishop Theophanes of Poltava and Pereyaslavl, wrote the following in his work, "Short canonical judgements on chronology":
   
 "Question. Have the pastors of the Orthodox Church not made special judgements concerning the calendar?

 "Answer. They have, many times - with regard to the introduction of the new Roman calendar - both in private assemblies and in councils.

 "A proof of this is the following. First of all, the Ecumenical Patriarch Jeremiah II, who lived at the same time as the Roman calendar reform, immediately, in 1582, together with his Synod condemned the new Roman system of chronology as being not in agreement with the Tradition of the Church. In the next year (1583), with the participation of Patriarchs Sylvester of Alexandria and Sophronius VI of Jerusalem, he convened a Church Council. This Council recognised the Gregorian calendar to be not in agreement with the canons of the Universal Church and with the decree of the First Ecumenical Council on the method of calculating the day of Holy Pascha.

 Through the labours of this Council there appeared: a Conciliar tome, which denounced the wrongness and unacceptability for the Orthodox Church of the Roman calendar, and a canonical conciliar Decree - the Sigillion of November 20, 1583. In this Sigillion all three of the above-mentioned Patriarchs with their Synods called on the Orthodox firmly and unbendingly, even to the shedding of their blood, to hold the Orthodox Menaion and Julian Paschalion, threatening the transgressors of this with anathema, cutting them off from the Church of Christ and the gathering of the faithful…

 In the course of the following three centuries: the 17th, 18th and 19th, a whole series of Ecumenical Patriarchs decisively expressed themselves against the Gregorian calendar and, evaluating it in the spirit of the conciliar decree of Patriarch Jeremiah II, counselled the Orthodox to avoid it…"

 "Question. Is the introduction of the new calendar important or of little importance?

 "Answer. Very important, especially in connection with the Paschalion and it is an extreme disorder and ecclesiastical schism, which draws people away from communion and unity with the whole Church of Christ, deprives them of the grace of the Holy Spirit, shakes the dogma of the unity of the Church and, like Arius, tears the seamless robe of Christ, that is, everywhere divides the Orthodox, depriving them of oneness of mind; breaks the bond with Ecclesiastical Holy Tradition, and makes them fall under conciliar condemnation for despising Tradition…

 "Question. How must the Orthodox relate to the new calendarist schismatics, according to the canons?

 "Answer. They must have no communion in prayer with them, even before their conciliar condemnation…

 "Question. What punishment is fitting, according to the Church canons, for those who pray with the new calendarist schismatics?

 "Answer. The same condemnation with them…" 

Thanks to Fr. Anthony Gavalas for emailing this out.

Orthodoxia i Thanatos

www.YouTube.com/GreekOrthodoxTV

User avatar
GOCTheophan
Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon 11 September 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Ireland.
Contact:

Re: St. Theophan the Recluse on the New Calendar

Post by GOCTheophan »

Dear Drewmeister,

That isnt St Theophan the recluse, but St Theophan the New Recluse, or St Theophan of Poltava.

Also he has only been glorified by the catacombniki in Russia under the Matthewites.

I was Baptised in his name by the GOC-CII though, I presume with the Bishop's blessing- if you ask privately for the email of the priest who Baptised me and the Bishop he is under I will give them to you. I am not sure however whether they in general consider him a saint, or whether ROAC does.

He however along with Archbishop Matthew of Blessed Memory was the greatest True Orthodox hierarch of the 20 th century. Unfortunately ROCOR came under the sway more of Met Anthony, a modernist theologian even though an anti-Sergianist one. ROCOR was rotten from day one.

Theophan.

User avatar
drewmeister2
Member
Posts: 235
Joined: Sun 21 August 2005 8:45 pm
Faith: Eastern Orthodox
Jurisdiction: GOC/HOTCA
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Post by drewmeister2 »

Oh thank you I didnt realize there was two people named St. Theophan the Recluse. Do other Synods at least recognize him as holy?

Orthodoxia i Thanatos

www.YouTube.com/GreekOrthodoxTV

User avatar
GOCTheophan
Member
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon 11 September 2006 7:46 pm
Location: Ireland.
Contact:

Post by GOCTheophan »

drewmeister2 wrote:

Oh thank you I didnt realize there was two people named St. Theophan the Recluse. Do other Synods at least recognize him as holy?

Well HOCNA and OCA Archbishop Lazar consider him to have been insane.

Blessed Averky of Jordanville and Fr Seraphim Rose considered him holy, as does much of ROCOR, he remains a controversial figure though because his relationship with ROCOR after 1920 was rather ambigous though I believe there is no way that you can say that he didnt consider them still Orthodox (I know Matthewites who say that he didnt consider them Orthodox).

Some though in ROCOR have a great dislike for him given his relationship with Metropolitian Anthony.

He is commemorated as a righteous one on some ROCOR calendars.

He is mentioned in this article by Fr Seraphim Rose.

http://www.desertwisdom.org/dttw/truth/ ... thers.html

Here is some more information on him-

http://stjohnthebaptist.org.au/articles ... ophan.html

Theophan.

Post Reply