Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

This forum is for polite discussion of political and social topics that may be uncomfortable for inquirers and some members. This includes anything politically charged, conspiracy theories, and/or end-times theories. All Forum Rules apply.


Post Reply
User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

Post by Maria »

Dated June 19, 2017 --

An 80-year-old retired MI5 agent, John Hopkins, has made a series of astonishing confessions since he was released from hospital in London on Wednesday and told he has weeks to live. Hopkins claims to have been involved in 23 assassinations for the British intelligence agency between 1973 and 1999, including Princess Diana. ...

Mr. Hopkins says Princess Diana is unique among his victims, as she is the only female he ever assassinated, as well as the only Royal. She is also the only victim that the Royal Family themselves ordered to be taken out. ...

  • “She knew too many Royal secrets. She had a huge grudge and she was going to go public with all sorts of wild claims. My boss told me she had to die – he’d received orders directly from Prince Philip – and we had to make it look like an accident. I’d never killed a woman before, much less a princess, but I obeyed orders. I did it for Queen and country.”

...

Asked why he didn’t refuse the job, or expose the plot at the time, he explained “MI5 agents swear allegiance to the Crown, we can’t be impartial when it comes to the Royal family. At best I would have been done for treason, at worst Philip would have designed a grisly fate for me.”

Click the following link to read the entire article: http://yournewswire.com/mi5-agent-kille ... ess-diana/

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

Post by Maria »

And a related article dated March 15, 2016:

...Princess Diana’s close personal friend and confidant Christine Fitzgerald has gone on the record for the first time and what she has to say will send shockwaves around the world.

  • • Christine Fitzgerald confirms Diana was ‘murdered by MI6 at the behest of the Windsors’ ...

    “Don’t think that just because they have cut-glass accents doesn’t mean they aren’t more vicious and criminal than the mob. They ARE. They will take out anyone who stands in their way. They will do anything to keep control.”

    “MI6 had been monitoring Diana for years before her death. She was surrounded by staff who were actually working for MI6, many of whom she liked and trusted. She was always second guessing herself and everyone around her, always wondering if she was paranoid.”

...

Click the following link to read the entire article: http://yournewswire.com/queen-elizabeth ... st-friend/

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

User avatar
Maria
Archon
Posts: 8428
Joined: Fri 11 June 2004 8:39 pm
Faith: True Orthodox Christian
Jurisdiction: GOC
Location: USA

Re: Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

Post by Maria »

Okay, so here are two news reports. One purports that the MI5 killed Princess Diana, while the other claims that the deed was done by the MI6.

What is the difference between British Military Intelligence 5 and 6? Or does it matter?

Lord Jesus Christ, have mercy on me a sinner.

User avatar
Barbara
Archon
Posts: 5593
Joined: Sat 29 September 2012 6:03 pm

Re: Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

Post by Barbara »

MI-5 is the domestic spy service, whereas MI-6 is foreign operations.
Surely this would have been accomplished by MI-5. Except if the fact that the demise of Diana occurred in France required mobilization of foreign operatives working for the British.

Seemingly the account of the retired MI-5 agent John Hopkins is more accurate. First, he claims he conducted the dreadful operation himself.
Second, he knows which agency is which !

The testimony of Christine Fitzgerald is more anecdotal. Perhaps she didn't distinguish between the 2 intelligence services. That may not have been her field of expertise.
She sounded authentic in her statement about the frightening barbarity of the so-called "Royal Family". They sound like glorified thugs.
Prince Philip was the son of Princess Alice of Battenberg, who did have serious mental problems, as her biographer revealed.

For a snippet of Philip's unstable early life :

"In 1930-31, the family fell completely apart. All four of Philip’s sisters, who were educated in Germany, married German noblemen and moved to Germany. Then Prince Andrew abandoned his wife and Philip and ran off to live with his mistress on her yacht anchored in the Mediterranean off Monte Carlo where Andrew quickly became addicted to the gaming tables.

"Philip’s mother collapsed under the strain. She suffered a nervous breakdown and was institutionalized in Switzerland at the famed Bellevue Sanatorium. That left little Philip all alone in Paris, with no one to care for him. He was only nine.

"Philip was then sent to England to be cared for by his maternal grandmother. But then she died. Next he moved in with his Uncle George, who, by 1938, was dead also. Philip was 17 at the time."
https://lisawallerrogers.com/2010/07/01 ... d-a-habit/

Honestly speaking, I have never liked Philip's face. He looks weak and cruel at the same time. I don't know whether Prince Philip was in fact the one who ordered the killing of Diana. But certainly it is worth considering. Christine Fitzgerald makes it clear that the Royal Family is cutthroat more than civilised [ British spelling ], which helps the casual observer to assimilate this unpleasant possibility.

Both people's disclosures are powerful revelations.

Probably Cyprian will be able to enlighten us better, as he researched and wrote about this matter extensively. [ Good that he doesn't offer his exact town in the Greater Seattle area ! Smart of him. ]

User avatar
Barbara
Archon
Posts: 5593
Joined: Sat 29 September 2012 6:03 pm

Re: Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

Post by Barbara »

Pulling up an old thread, not exactly related, but about the same clan
See the link to observe the incredible similarity !

WHO would wear RED for such an occasion anyway ? Tastless !!!


"That time Kate Middleton wore a dress identical to the one in the horror film ‘Rosemary's Baby' to present her 2nd son Prince Louis

In this movie Rosemary...gives birth to the Antichrist"


https://x.com/Vision4theBlind/status/19 ... 2049908777

A commenter joked that at least we have some years til the kid grows up...

User avatar
Cyprian
Sr Member
Posts: 838
Joined: Sat 12 November 2005 6:40 am
Faith: True Orthodox Christianity
Contact:

Re: Princess Diana -- Murdered by MI5

Post by Cyprian »

These reports are of course deliberate misdirection, and meant to feed and titillate the conspiracy-minded. The real truth of what happened with Diana is not going to be openly and plainly revealed as these liars and frauds would have us believe. This guy Hopkins is a total liar.

As I've said on multiple occasions, before the secret society (the British Royal family are key players) executes an op like the Diana staged crash, they not only have a story already worked out for the mainstream press, which most of the world will unquestioningly believe, but they also have at least one, if not multiple, other alternative conspiracy narratives already ready to disseminate.

Do folks really think the secret society which rules over the world is so unsophisticated and inept, that they cannot create multiple alternative explanations in advance, including conspiracies to draw in that small percentage of the public who will never buy into the mainstream explanation of events?

So, the most popular and well-known alternative explanation to the mainstream narrative, that the Royal family had her killed, is the most easy for folks to believe, because they are deliberately leading you by the nose to buy into it.

It's an alternative theory suited for those who don't take the time to look into things deeply, or are just starting out on the journey of questioning the mainstream narrative.

Similarly, with COVID, there was the bogus mainstream narrative, that this deadly disease just appeared out of nowhere, and no one could have predicted it, and then there is the most popular (because the secret society behind the COVID psy-op strove to make it popular) alternative, which is it was deliberately leaked from a lab in Wuhan.

Neither of these narratives were true.

Folks who want to take conspiracies seriously, would do well to realize that not only is the mainstream narrative bogus, but usually the most popular and seemingly plausible alternative is bogus as well.

Diana faked her death in an auto accident, plain and simple. Neither Prince Philip nor anyone else in the Firm ordered her death. In fact, the John Grisham novel The Firm, and the film adaption The Firm (1993), starring Tom Cruise, are ritually publishing foreknowledge about Diana's faked death in Paris in a car crash four years later.

That's why Tom Cruise starred in the film (and other films of his are also about Diana's faked death), because he has the same birthday, July 3, as Henri-Paul, Diana's supposed drunk driver of her Mercedes in Paris. That's why Tom Cruise's character Mitch gets a Mercedes-Benz for joining the Firm.

Cruise's character's wife is named "Abby" McDeere in the film, for obvious reasons. Because Princess Diana's fake funeral was held at Westminster Abbey on 6 September 1997. So you see, Tom Cruise drives a Mercedes in the film, and shares the same birthday as the driver of Diana's Mercedes, and his wife Abby is for Westminster Abbey.

To prove that all of this is not a coincidence, we would have to explore the rest of Tom Cruise's body of work, as well as that of his co-star Jeanne Tripplehorn (for the triple crescent moon goddess Diana), whose birthday just happens to be June 10, the same as Prince Philip, who supposedly ordered the hit, according to this fable that has been deliberately planted.

Of course, it was also no coincidence that Sydney Pollack was slated to direct The Firm (1993), because he shares the same birthday, July 1, as Diana. He was born in Lafayette, Indiana, which is named for the French general Marquis de Lafayette, the Revolutionary War hero who died in Paris, about one mile from Diana's purported crash in Paris. Furthermore, the secret society uses Indiana to refer to Diana, Princess of Wales, because In-Diana contains her name.

Furthermore, the flag of the state of Indiana features a gold torch which the satanist and sodomite Elton John (who is a close friend of the Royal Family, the Queen knighted him) alludes to in his famous performance at Diana's fake funeral:

♪ This torch we'll always carry for our nation's golden child ♪

Hence the gold torch on the state flag of In-DIANA.

Furthermore, President William Henry Harrison is known as the "Father of the Indiana Territory" having served as the first governor of the Indiana Territory from 1801 to 1812.

Notice his first two names William and Henry, are the first two sons of Diana, Prince William and Prince Henry (Harry). Notice his surname Harrison, means "son of Harry".

Could you have a name more closely associated to the two princes, than the name "William Henry Harrison"?

So, the fact that Sydney Pollack shares the same birthday, July 1, as Diana, the town he was born in is named after someone who died in Paris, very close to where they claim Diana died, and the state he was born in is associated to Diana's son, the princes William and Henry (Harry) serves to explain why this director was chosen for this film The Firm (1993), about Diana's staged and faked death from a car crash. Of course, once again, to prove that none of this is a coincidence it would be necessary to explore the entire film career, both acting and directing, of Sydney Pollack.

Speaking of the state of In-diana, and the connection to Diana, that is why the satanic director Steven Spielberg, who was born in Cincinnati, only several miles from where William Henry Harrison lived, came up with the character named Henry "Indiana" Jones for his propaganda film Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981), which of course, as I've written about extensively over the years, is all about Diana's fake crash psy-op.

Since the this film is all about Diana and her fake crash, we can know that these fictional fables which claim that Prince Philip and the Royals wanted Diana dead because of the supposed secrets she was going to reveal is total nonsense and propaganda.

How can that be, when Diana's fake crash was planned out long before she ever married Prince Charles and was welcomed into the Royal Family, and therefore had no secrets to spill?

In fact, Raiders of the Lost Ark was released in the United States on June 12, 1981. June 12, i.e. 6/12 because 6 / (6+6) = 12, i.e. 666.

Rosemary's Baby (1968), which is all about Diana, England's Rose, was released on the same day in 1968, 6/12, i.e. 3 sixes for 6/6+6.

So, Raiders of the Lost Ark was released in the U.K. on July 30, 1981, the very day after Diana's wedding, right among all the hype about Diana's fake wedding to Charles. So, Raiders of the Lost Ark was playing in theaters right when Diana had her fake, arranged marriage to Charles, and this was no coincidence.

Harrison Ford is more than 9 years older than his co-star, b

Henry (Indiana) and the actor Paul Freeman, who plays René Belloq, are key rivals in the film. Why is the character Henry paired with the actor Paul as his rival in the film?

Henry and Paul, for Diana's supposed, drunk driver who killed her, Henri-Paul. Of course, it's no coincidence that the year previously this actor Paul Freeman appeared in Death of a Princess (1980), obviously referring to Diana, Princess of Wales.

Immediately after the fiery truck explosion, where Indiana Jones (Jones is the most popular surname in Wales, for Diana, Princess of Wales), Henry "Indiana" Jones is shown getting drunk, thinking his lover has died. So Henry is shown getting drunk, for the drunk driver Henri-Paul, of the Mercedes said to be charioting Diana.

Who was said to be sitting in the front passenger seat of Diana's ill-fated Mercedes? Diana's bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones.

Do you think that might have something to do with name Henry "Indiana" Jones? The bodyguard Jones was in the front seat of Diana's car when it crashed (so they allege).

Trevor Rees-Jones. The surname Jones means "John's son", and that's why John Rhys-Davies is Indy's good friend in the film, the "best digger in Cairo". His name Rhys is pronounced the same as Rees.

AI Overview
Yes, Rhys and Reese are directly related, with Reese serving as an Anglicized, phonetic spelling of the original Welsh name Rhys. Both names share the same meaning, generally interpreted as "enthusiasm," "ardor," or "fiery". While Rhys is the traditional Welsh spelling, Reese has become a popular variant in English-speaking countries.

Marion, Indy's love interest, is thought by Indy to have died in the back of a vehicle, like Diana, but later....she turns up alive! Just as the world was led to believe that Diana was dead, but in fact she wasn't.

According to the narrative of the psy-op written by the Illuminati, Diana was "kidnapped" from Paris, like Helen of Troy (Queen of Sparta), the most beautiful woman in the world, was kidnapped (or willingly ran away, eloping) with Prince Paris of Troy.

Not unlike how the actress Rossana Podestà (Helen, Queen of Sparta) was kidnapped/eloped with Jacques Sernas (Prince Paris of Troy) in the movie Helen of Troy (1956). Notice the name Rossana means Rose, and she elopes with the actor Jacques. Not unlike Titanic (1997), which is all about Diana's fake crash in Paris, where you have another pair of star-crossed lovers, Rose and Jack.

Returning to Raiders of the Lost Ark, what is the birthday of Henry "Indiana" Jones? His birthdate is July 1, 1899. O wonder! He has the same birthday as Diana, Princess of Wales.

He's about 10 years older than his lover Marion, and Charles was more than 12 years older than Diana.

O wonder! Raiders of the Lost Ark features an extended car chase scene with four passengers in a black Mercedes, just as Diana was one of the 4 purported passengers in her purported car crash.

O wonder! The black Mercedes is rammed into and run off the road, just as they claim with Diana!

Of course, not long after this, the Nazis take a captive Indy and Marion to a mysterious, deserted, unchartered island, to open the Ark of the Covenant.

Of course, a key feature of the Ark of the Covenant is the mercy seat, the gold lid featuring two cherubim. And what does Mercedes mean? Mercies, for the mercy seat.

So, yes, Indiana Jones and the Raiders of the Lost Ark is just one of many famous films about Diana, which I have written extensively about. Some of the biggest blockbusters in history, like Raiders of the Lost Ark, the Terminator films, and Titanic, are all about Diana and her fake and staged crash in Paris.

Star Wars are other famous ones. Chariots of Fire. Back to the Future. Julia Roberts films like Pretty Woman. The English Patient. Mission Impossible. So many. I can't write about them all in one post.

Post Reply