Political cartoons and memes

[Barbara]

Ohhh = ick ! Thank you for the update. I had not seen about this guy you showed.
Thank you for including that so i didn't have to ask what that 4 letter acronym means. I must be the most out-of-it person in this country !

But are you saying that the victim of that crime on Sept 10, St Job of Pochaev's Day, was supporting home...'s & the other one ???
I had gathered that he was opposing them. I was trying to find one point good about him. So that impression is wrong that he was a social conservative ?

This is important because all these so-called Republicans seem to be the biggest fans of home...'s. There are so MANY of them who are secret ones themselves.
How can any of us support ANY of these politicians ??

We all know about one of the most obvious, LG. Note his initials are the same as the start of that odious collection of letters....

But there are many more also hiding out, voting AGAINST such initiatives, but living frighteningly depraved lives out of the public eye.
How could ANY of THESE members of Congress EVER claim to represent the American public, which still is not really in favor of them [I hope !]

Thanks for your insights and explanations, eish, much appreciated !

PS Was that victim supporting women not working but staying as mothers ? I read that one place but it could have wrong also.

[eish]

But are you saying that the victim of that crime on Sept 10, St Job of Pochaev's Day, was supporting home...'s & the other one ???

He was one of the biggest proponents of welcoming them into “conservatism” without any repentance and while maintaining their public sins. He did call out some of their misbehaviours, however. The shooter chose to murder him at the moment while he was pointing out the objective fact that nearly every mass shooting in recent history was committed by one of them (excluding gang fights).

He advocated for accepting their lifestyles, but also pointed out some criticisms of them. That was enough in their eyes to warrant murdering him.

There are so MANY of them who are secret ones themselves.
How can any of us support ANY of these politicians ??
...
But there are many more also hiding out, voting AGAINST such initiatives, but living frighteningly depraved lives out of the public eye.
How could ANY of THESE members of Congress EVER claim to represent the American public, which still is not really in favor of them [I hope !]

Don't fall for it. They want us to judge leaders and potential leaders by secret sins. Often based on secret and anonymous accusations from degenerates.

If any fag can come out in public and accuse some conservative leader of sinning with him, or if any fag phone app company--most readers know which one I'm thinking of--can publish possibly fake records of conservative leaders supposedly using their services, they can use this as a weapon to squash opposition to their agenda. DO NOT judge private sins, especially unproven ones, the same way as public advocacy for such sins.

Some conservative Republican senator wants to legislate against faggotry, then all the fags suddenly come forward to testify that he is secretly one of them. IT IS NOT TRUE. FAGGOTS LIE TO DISCREDIT THEIR OPPONENTS.

In in the odd case where it really was provably true, we judge such a man much more leniently than the ones who were doing the sin openly and promoting it. A man should be welcome to continue advocating against sin even if he has previously fallen to it, heinous though this particular sin may be.

Support those who publicly oppose degeneracy. Back them to the hilt. Never punch right.

PS Was that victim supporting women not working but staying as mothers ? I read that one place but it could have wrong also.

No idea. He may have; he was a liberal who rightly pointed out that some ways of living work better than others.

I don't want to overplay that position anyway. Yes, women should be mostly at home taking care of the kids, but they also need to make some accommodations for contributing to supporting the family. It's always been that way; only the ultra-rich can really stay at home and do nothing else than look after the kids. A small domestic business or other income source is quite normal historically.

whoradicalizedyou.png (439.32 KiB) Viewed 637 times

[Barbara]

Partial reply to the above thought-provoking post
I didn't know it was SO common that these evil incidents were done by such kind of people

I did write a long time ago, probably here on Euphrosynos Cafe, that i felt THEY would be the terrorists of the future. Never Muslims, who are wrongly blamed or set up as scapegoats.

Sure enough, it sounds like it's happening already. I haven't been keeping up on that sector of the news.
I know they are desperate for acceptance and attention through being demonic, so this is the natural extension of that twisted type of mind.

What you wrote about that man having made even some criticisms of them being enough to cause that incident shows how THEY are the ones who should be eavesdropped on and followed and monitored.

No wonder i couldn't stand to even hear his name seeing a headline flash by on X ! If he was accepting of them to THAT DEGREE< it shows he was NOT at all a person of light, but of darkness.

[eish]

...

It's too late to call him out. Yes, Charlie stood for liberal principles. He was not really on the right at all. Still, he died for criticising them and that does count for something. We can mourn his passing and pray for his soul.

It marks the end of an era. There is no more argument to be made for reasoning with blue-haired communists.

dialoguewithevil.png (183.7 KiB) Viewed 552 times

vlenochliberalism.png (169.71 KiB) Viewed 552 times

[eish]

Many a truth is spoken in jest. “Studies have found” and “scientific fact” mean much less once you understand what those terms really imply.

scientist2.png (3.58 MiB) Viewed 501 times

[eish]

lawandjustice.png (613.45 KiB) Viewed 440 times

[eish]

For the life of me, I just can't figure out why oligarchs prefer democracy.

monarchy.png (986.86 KiB) Viewed 410 times