New World Order: Why Does it Matter?

[Maria]

Unfortunately, we have been programmed and conditioned from the earliest years to not believe in the existence, or even the possibility, of large-scale conspiracies. Students of history learn in introductory courses that there are three views of the philosophy of history. First, the random contingency view in which historical events are merely “one darn thing after another” (as one of my professors so elegantly stated), with no apparent reason or causal significance. Second, the so-called “great man” view, in which key religious and political figures cause certain landmark events with history revolving around these figures, such as a Napoleon or a Caesar. The third and least popular is the providential or conspiratorial view. In this view, history is led along by unseen forces, be they malevolent or beneficent. Humans play their role to be sure, but man is not the autonomous god of his own destiny. He is the actor on a stage in which there is a grand narrative and ultimate reason for every event, even if humans are not always cognizant of those reasons.

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2016/01 ... -matter-2/

We were never taught in our world history classes that "history repeats itself".

Yet, we were encouraged to read The Prince, which is the blueprint that the New World Order follows and has been following for hundreds of years. Its prime directive is to fomenting continual wars to reduce the young male population and thereby control the population. With a reduction of young men, there is a less likelihood of a rebellion or a coup to overthrow the government. The Prince is the conspiratorial plan which has been followed for thousands of years alike by dictators and by future dictators, such as Hitler, Stalin, Lenin, Bush, and now Obama

On the contrary, in Europe, with the invasion of millions of young Muslim men, we have the possibility of a complete overthrow of European governments and the installation of Sharia rule.

[Barbara]

Interesting.
Yes, it seems more and more obvious that World War I - and World War II - were whipped up out of literally nowhere to
send all the youthful men in all the European countries and also others, too, such as India, to early deaths so that they would not oppose the evil agenda about to be foisted on the world.
All the senseless killing in trench warfare, where hundreds of thousands of soldiers could be killed only to capture one small hill, which would be retaken by the enemy soon after.
When one reads the unglamorous details of those endless campaigns, one realizes that this was clearly not by chance. By malevolent design, instead.

To think, too, that in the early years of the 1900s, every man felt proud to rush to immediately volunteer himself in his
country's armed forces. Of course, in countries like Britain, there were drives to promote patriotism. These resulted in
enlistment of many idealistic young men, who would never think of running away to Mexico or Canada, as our American kids did during Vietnam.
On the other hand, the men of the 60s were maybe cynical enough to realize that something sinister was going on and refused to participate. Nonetheless, it was not an honorable course of action to take.

Today hardly anyone would go fight. Only if paid something adequate in an economy where jobs are scarce, like the 2000s which saw many lower class, poor and uneducated sign up for service in Afghanistan and Iraq. Idealism had nothing to do with their presence there.

[Barbara]

Anecdotal evidence of how WW I killed off 'the best and the brightest' of young Englishmen is the following. The Lady Diana Cooper whom I referenced on one of Cyprian's threads - he would thoroughly agree with the theme here - was the toast of the young English jet set. She proclaimed, however, that she would choose any particular suitor but would marry whomever in her 'set' returned alive from the war.
Sure enough, all the up and coming men of the upper classes she knew never came back !

The journalist Duff Cooper was the only one who returned; hence Diana married him. Perhaps not too enthusiastically, but she followed through with her stated vow.

Imagine how all the educated youth from the best families, groomed to succeed their fathers in high positions and take the reins of the British govt. after WW I, were massacred. Probably a lot of incompetent people filled their positions, leading to a weak British position worldwide, and probably many internal mistakes bringing about the ruin of the old British Empire. Ditto this in France, Germany, Austria, Belgium, Holland, Italy, etc.

[Cyprian]

On the contrary, in Europe, with the invasion of millions of young Muslim men, we have the possibility of a complete overthrow of European governments and the installation of Sharia rule.

If the hidden powers lurking in the shadows have no problem thoroughly manipulating and controlling the estimated 325 million people here in the United States of America, why should we so readily believe that these same powers, who exert a similar vice-like grip over Europe, would be in any way threatened by a few million Muslim immigrants?

This exodus of refugees from Syria and elsewhere is completely scripted by their own design, and is not happening against their will. It is essential to their plans to herd a certain amount of Muslims into Europe and the Americas, so Muslim immigrants can be the scapegoat for their false flag attacks.

We should have already learned this lesson from 9/11. Bush and his New World Order cohorts were indeed behind the attacks of September 11, and yet the "official" story is that it was nineteen Muslim hijackers who were responsible.