The anti-christian nature of Vatican II

The resting place of threads that were very valid in 2004, but not so much in 2024. Basically this is a giant historical archive.


Post Reply
User avatar
Nikodemus
Member
Posts: 223
Joined: Thu 7 April 2005 7:28 am
Location: Stockholm

The anti-christian nature of Vatican II

Post by Nikodemus »

Before God guided me to the Orthodox Church I was a Roman Catholic for about ten years, and a very active catholic too. I converted to catholicism through the well-known organisation Opus Dei and was for many years an extreme papist. Papism as a heresy looks on the pope the same way as true Christians look on the Holy Fathers of The Ecumenical Synods. Whatever the pope say is true and should not be criticised. The problem for me araised when I discovered that many popes had contradicted themselves. To the point of this topic, I would like to inform you about the anti-christian nature of the Vatican II documents, since I have studied the most important among them with great interest. The main argument is the documents Gaudium et Spes, Dignitates Humane and later encyclicals of John Paul II as Ut Unum SInt.

If anyone have heard about the meeting of Assisi where Tibetan Buddhists put a Buddha statue on the altar of the cathedral and venerated their pagan god, this is what Vatican II ends up to. The buddhists put the statue on the altar with the blessing of the cathlic Church!!! Later John Paul II kissed the Quaran in a Mosque in Damaskus, received a mark on his forehead by a shiva-worshipper in India ( I have a phote of this event) and prayed with the indians of North America. What is Vatican II and Gaudium et Spes in particular? What is Assisi? It is, as the catholic theologioans themself call: INTEGRAL HUMANISM. It is a HUMANISM at the EXPENCE of the SALT of CHRIST, at the expence of the TRUE CONFESSION of OUR SAVIOUR AND GOD. It is a new Chruch were the priest no longer are turned east during prayer (that is ad orientem - to GOD) but to MAN, to the Wst. The priest turned 180 degrees after the liturgical reform of Vatican II. Historically this humanism was first defended by the masons during the french revolution, and especially by the illuminaty who is famous for the worship of man, of science och mans reason and intellect, of everything that is called man. It is the confession that MAN is God, and not vice versa. It is the first temptation of the snake in paradise, the building of the tower of Babylon in modern times - Unated Nations and the Catholic Church as a defender of Human Rights but not of the Rights of Christ to Rule all of creation.

I qutoe Paul VI who was pope during the council when He spoke to the Unatide Nations he ended up saying the words:

…know how to recognize our new humanism; we too have, more than anyone else, the cult of man.

Exact science must presently fall upon its own keen sword...from Skepsis there is a path to "second religiousness," which is the sequel and not the preface of the Culture.

Oswald Spengler

Post Reply