Abortion Debate

The resting place of threads that were very valid in 2004, but not so much in 2024. Basically this is a giant historical archive.


Post Reply
User avatar
Kollyvas
Protoposter
Posts: 1811
Joined: Mon 26 September 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Abortion Debate

Post by Kollyvas »

http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dl ... 1/51117006

Judge says parental-notification abortion law is constitutional

Associated Press

Kansas City ? A state judge on today ruled that a law that allows parents to sue people who help their daughters get abortions without their consent is constitutional.

But Jackson County Circuit Judge Charles Atwell issued an injunction against enforcing the law pending an expected appeal to the Missouri Supreme Court. Atwell also ruled that no one could be investigated or disciplined for possibly violating the law until the higher court?s ruling.

Atwell issued a temporary restraining order against the law in October after Planned Parenthood sued to block it. He said at the time that the law likely violated constitutional rights to free speech and due process and could cause irreparable harm to Planned Parenthood and its patients.

The center of the debate is language in the law that allows parents to sue anyone who ?intentionally cause, aid or assist? their minor daughters in getting abortions without their consent.

Planned Parenthood had argued that passage could be widely interpreted to prohibit offering any advice to a pregnant minor, even if she did not get an abortion.

Assistant Attorney General Vickie Mahon had argued in a hearing before Atwell in October that the law might raise concerns about First Amendment rights only if someone provided information on crossing state lines to obtain an abortion elsewhere.

After denying Planned Parenthood?s motions to dismiss the case for lack of standing and to declare it unconstitutional, Atwell said the ?heart and soul of the case? was freedom of speech. The judge also said the law has ?a real potential of reaching clearly protected speech.?

Atwell ruled today that providing information on reproductive rights and options to minors would be protected speech. In a written ruling, he said given his narrowing construction of the language?s meaning, he found ?with substantial trepidation? that the law is constitutional.

Gov. Matt Blunt said in a written statement that he was pleased with the ruling and had been confident it would withstand constitutional scrutiny and reduce the number of abortions in Missouri....

User avatar
Kollyvas
Protoposter
Posts: 1811
Joined: Mon 26 September 2005 5:02 pm
Location: Mesa, AZ
Contact:

Disabled Woman Sues For "Wrongful Life"

Post by Kollyvas »

http://www.courttv.com/news/2005/1110/harriton_ctv.html

In 'wrongful life' suit, disabled woman blames doctor for letting her be born


Olga Harriton (right) says she would have had an abortion if she had known that daughter Alexia, 24, was going to be born permanently disabled.

By Emanuella Grinberg
Court TV
A blind and deaf Australian woman who claims she never should have been born is suing a doctor for a lifetime of suffering in the country's first "wrongful life" suit.

Alexia Harriton, 24, is seeking compensation from the doctor who misdiagnosed rubella in the first trimester of her mother's pregnancy, claiming Olga Harriton would have aborted her had she been aware of the potential birth defects arising from the illness.

Lawyers for the Sydney woman argued in Australia's highest court Thursday that Dr. Paul Stephens is liable for the costs arising from a lifetime of medical treatment that Harriton needs to survive.

His negligence resulted in the birth of a child who is "profoundly disabled," a media spokesperson for the law firm representing Harriton told Courttv.com....

Post Reply