New Bishop for the Kyrikite-Romano-Kenyan Synod
Moderator: Mark Templet
It' s really obscure that Met. Kyrikos ordained fr. Mathew for a practically inexistent folk in Kenya when it was the Ukrano-Russian catacomb folk first that asked from him to ordained a bishop for them...
This was during that period when Met. Kyrikos was struggling to prove that "single-handed" consecrations are valid. Well, he stopped bringing secret documents of reposed bishops that allowed him to move on solely with consecrations , since he found these "confessing Romanian bishops" (according to him)!
So, the next in line are fr. Amphilochius Tambouras and then the Ukranian fr. Seraphim..?
XPICTOC ANECTH
since he found these "confessing Romanian bishops" (according to him)!
Do you have any information that contradict him.? What do you know about these Romanian Bishops?
So, the next in line are fr. Amphilochius Tambouras and then the Ukranian fr. Seraphim..?
I know who the first one is, who is the later? is he Greek or Russian?
Christ is Risen
Petros
- Constantine
- Member
- Posts: 120
- Joined: Tue 25 July 2006 9:58 pm
Mr.C wrote:Dear LMP/Kallinkos, are you for real?
I cannot talk to someone who's reffering to my person as "LMP/Kallinkos" instead of Kallinikos. I'm not like this (guy-girl?) LMP who kept answering back to him.
Mr. C reminds me of some Russian guys who are reffering to anyone opposite to them as " (KGB) agents". (Mr.C : LMP/this, LMP/that )
Mr.C wrote:A florinite is talking about..
Furthermore more I'm not from Florina, not even from Greece.
petros_p wrote:Do you have any information that contradict him.? What do you know about these Romanian Bishops?
Dear petros_p, these same bishops in the past have admitted that they have paid an amount so as get ordained as bishops (simony). We don't need any eyewitnesses. As for official documents ask the secretaries of the synods that they (Romanian bishops) have requested to be received in the past. I asked my self the secretery of the GOC-CII Bishop Photios.
GOCPriestMark wrote:I found out about them 5 or 6 years ago, but at that time they didn't even know who had consecrated Bishop Victor Leu.
What kind of clerics are they? They got consecrated to bishopric by someone whom didn't know if he had a valid Apostolic succession? It sounds like they act in a very naive manner.
Dear petros_p doesn’t this ring you a bell..?
GOCPriestMark wrote:the Romanian bishops rejected the Kiousis synod because they don't practise what they claim to believe.
Dear petros_p, this is obviously a typical answer from someone (not from fr. Mark..) who always get rejected.
Not to mention the fact that despite knowing all these years (as they admit that one of their elders had told them in the past) that "there are orthodox bishops in Greece, ordained by a Bishop Matthaios of Bresthena", they kept asking to be received by other synods..!
There are many things that you cannot overlook.
To MY opinion I'm not saying that they're not orthodox, but they have a mixed-up Apostolic succession and generally a very obscure history.
Romanian Bishops
Dear petros_p, these same bishops in the past have admitted that they have paid an amount so as get ordained as bishops (simony). We don't need any eyewitnesses.
Dear Kallinikos XPICTOC ANECTH
What are you saying? Who admitted simony to whom? and when?
Can you provide more details please?
I asked my self the secretery of the GOC-CII Bishop Photios
Well, can you give us the full story? Have these two bishops petitioned GOC-CII to be received and were rejected by CII?
GOCPriestMark wrote:
the Romanian bishops rejected the Kiousis synod because they don't practise what they claim to believe.
So who petioned whom? and who was rejected? Father Mark said that the Romanians rejected GOC-CII?
How could I get in touch with your bishop Photios does he have an email?
Thank You
Petros